2015
DOI: 10.1680/jgeot.14.p.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stresses in soil–bentonite slurry trench cut-off walls

Abstract: Changes made as a result of publishing processes such as copy-editing, formatting and page numbers may not be reflected in this version. For the definitive version of this publication, please refer to the published source. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite this paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the SHMP-20CaB preparation, tap water-SHMP-CaB slurry composed of 20 wt% amended bentonite was prepared and used to increase moisture content of the backfill to satisfy the target slump height. The SHMP-CaB slurry had Marsh viscosity of 39 s, filtrate loss of 22.6 mL, density of 1.15 g/cm 3 , and pH of 6.8 after hydration for 24 h. To control bentonite content in the backfill to be constant 20 wt%, additional amount of sand was added with the slurry during the slump tests. Moisture content of the prepared 20CaB backfill and SHMP-20CaB backfill at the target slump was 29.6% and 30.0%, respectively.…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the SHMP-20CaB preparation, tap water-SHMP-CaB slurry composed of 20 wt% amended bentonite was prepared and used to increase moisture content of the backfill to satisfy the target slump height. The SHMP-CaB slurry had Marsh viscosity of 39 s, filtrate loss of 22.6 mL, density of 1.15 g/cm 3 , and pH of 6.8 after hydration for 24 h. To control bentonite content in the backfill to be constant 20 wt%, additional amount of sand was added with the slurry during the slump tests. Moisture content of the prepared 20CaB backfill and SHMP-20CaB backfill at the target slump was 29.6% and 30.0%, respectively.…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SB slurry walls may be used as an interim measure for the short-term containment of impacted groundwater until an efficient and effective treatment technology is developed and deployed [2]. Low permeability and the contaminant sorption capacity are the two dominated properties of the backfill that control the containment performance of the walls [3,4]. To enhance service life and/or service performance of the SB slurry walls, novel bentonites including multiswellable bentonite MSB, contaminant-resistant bentonite SW101 [5], and bentonite-polymer composite BPC [6] were developed to reduce hydraulic conductivity of the SB backfills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Yet, new construction methods of underground walls in unstable soils were introduced in the 1940s in Italy and spread throughout the world. [10] The Slurry Trench Method of excavation [11,12] was first proposed in the United States more than 70 years ago, and consequently, a cutoff wall was constructed by Slurry Trench Method in 1948 in the Iceland Terminal of California. [13] The wall had a depth of 15 meters.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, an appropriate prediction of the lateral earth pressure development within the slurry wall is important. The hypothesis of the lateral squeezing modeling was initially proposed by Filz [5], and this method for modeling was then developed by many researchers considering the arching and squeezing effect for deep trenches [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-dimensional CSB slurry wall, with width and depth of B and H, respectively, surrounded by submerged medium dense sand, is investigated in this paper. It is assumed that the mixture placed into the trench along with the surrounding soils is homogeneous and isotropic, and the groundwater table is at the surface [5][6][7][8]. Since the horizontal strain of mixtures after placement is expected to be zero, the geometry of the problem is identified as plain-strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%