2005
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00496.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Striatal Inhibition of Nociceptive Responses Evoked in Trigeminal Sensory Neurons by Tooth Pulp Stimulation

Abstract: The noxious evoked response in trigeminal sensory neurons was studied to address the role of striatum in the control of nociceptive inputs. In urethane-anesthetized rats, the jaw opening reflex (JOR) was produced by suprathreshold stimulation of the tooth pulp and measured as electromyographic response in the digastric muscle, with simultaneous recording of noxious responses in single unit neurons of the spinal trigeminal nucleus pars caudalis (Sp5c). The microinjection of glutamate (80 mol/0.5 l) into striata… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
4
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons the JOR evoked by high intensities tooth pulp stimulation was considered to be a nociceptive response and a good measurement of analgesic effects. In addition, the latency of the JOR 7.9 ± 0.25 ms (range 6-10 ms, n = 60) (Saunier-Rébori and Pazo 2006), is compatible with conduction velocity of tooth pulp Ad nociceptors (range 10-20 m/s) and it is in agreement with previous articles from our and other laboratories (Belforte and Pazo 2005;Gear et al 1999).…”
Section: Striatal Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For these reasons the JOR evoked by high intensities tooth pulp stimulation was considered to be a nociceptive response and a good measurement of analgesic effects. In addition, the latency of the JOR 7.9 ± 0.25 ms (range 6-10 ms, n = 60) (Saunier-Rébori and Pazo 2006), is compatible with conduction velocity of tooth pulp Ad nociceptors (range 10-20 m/s) and it is in agreement with previous articles from our and other laboratories (Belforte and Pazo 2005;Gear et al 1999).…”
Section: Striatal Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…6a). Belforte and Pazo (2005) Similar results were observed in the responses of the C fibers input (Fig. 6a).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of cutaneous nociceptive CPu and GP neurons have large trigeminal receptive fields, sometimes incorporating the ipsilateral side of the face or much of the entire body (Chudler et al, 1993;Chudler, 1998). Electrical stimulation of the CPu can inhibit nociceptive neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Belforte and Pazo, 2005) and reduce the jaw opening reflex in rats (Belforte et al, 2001). However, the effects of dopamine depletion on tonic persistent trigeminal pain have not been performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%