2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03507-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strictureplasty versus bowel resection for the surgical management of fibrostenotic Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical recurrence was higher for bowel resection (29.4%) vs. strictureplasty (39.7%; p = 0.002). No difference was observed for medical recurrence for bowel resection (12.4%) vs. strictureplasty (18.0%; p = 0.82) and also for overall morbidity between bowel resection (18.1%) vs. strictureplasty (10.7%; p = 0.65) [39,40].…”
Section: Figure 12 the Michelassi Technique (1): A1 -Anastomosis Of Two Stenotic Segments B1 -The Edges Of Bowel Can Be Trimmed To Allow mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Surgical recurrence was higher for bowel resection (29.4%) vs. strictureplasty (39.7%; p = 0.002). No difference was observed for medical recurrence for bowel resection (12.4%) vs. strictureplasty (18.0%; p = 0.82) and also for overall morbidity between bowel resection (18.1%) vs. strictureplasty (10.7%; p = 0.65) [39,40].…”
Section: Figure 12 the Michelassi Technique (1): A1 -Anastomosis Of Two Stenotic Segments B1 -The Edges Of Bowel Can Be Trimmed To Allow mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Bowel resection is associated with lower recurrence rate (25.1%) compared to structureplasty (35.9%; p = 0.04). Recurrence-free survival was longer for bowel resection vs. strictureplasty (p = 0.02) [39,40].…”
Section: Figure 12 the Michelassi Technique (1): A1 -Anastomosis Of Two Stenotic Segments B1 -The Edges Of Bowel Can Be Trimmed To Allow mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with bowel resection, strictureplasty preserves intestinal length and minimizes the risk of short bowel syndrome, but has a higher risk of recurrence and its relapse‐free survival is significantly lower. Moreover, accompanying complications such as fistulae, abscesses, dysplasia and cancer are contraindications for strictureplasty, and its success largely depends on the operator's expertise 98,99 . A retrospective study in 2020 found that the 5‐year reoperation rates of bowel resection alone, strictureplasty alone and a combination of both procedures were 22%, 30% and 42%, respectively 100 .…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, bowel resection is the preferred surgical technique for fibrostenotic CD with lower incidences of postoperative infection, anastomotic leakage and reintervention due to the minimally invasive techniques used in bowel resection 101 . Instead, strictureplasty is more suitable for CD patients with strictures at a high risk of short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure 98 …”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%