2019
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav2111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strictures of a microchannel impose fierce competition to select for highly motile sperm

Abstract: Motility-based competition dynamics at microfluidic strictures suggests a sperm-selection mechanism in the reproductive tract.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…differential capacitation or hyperactivation kinetics). Studying these aspects of the phenotype will require improved methods to separate sperm with differing motility and probe their biochemistry and chromosomal content, with recent advances in microfluidics providing a potential route forward [47]. This work adds to the growing body of experimental and theoretical work demonstrating that even in animal sperm that undergo postmeiotic transcriptional shutdown, haploid selection within a single ejaculate is an important and underappreciated evolutionary force [49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…differential capacitation or hyperactivation kinetics). Studying these aspects of the phenotype will require improved methods to separate sperm with differing motility and probe their biochemistry and chromosomal content, with recent advances in microfluidics providing a potential route forward [47]. This work adds to the growing body of experimental and theoretical work demonstrating that even in animal sperm that undergo postmeiotic transcriptional shutdown, haploid selection within a single ejaculate is an important and underappreciated evolutionary force [49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because performing the fractionation in a large volume measures increased diffusion via increased general motility, rather than progressive linear velocity. Another contributing factor is likely to be the absence of the various strictures in the female reproductive tract that select for highly motile versus weakly motile cells [47]. We note however that since the bottom, least motile fraction contains an equal proportion of X-and Y-bearing sperm, any contamination of the upper, more motile fractions necessarily serves to reduce the skew, and that our results are therefore a conservative measure of X / Y motility differences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, these methods require a stringent skill set, lack standardized procedures, and prone to human errors (1), not to mention that they unfavorably are time consuming. However, new technologies with minimal perturbation, such as microfluidics, have been extensively explored and considered as promising remedies for the flaws associated with the conventional methods (2,7,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Figures 1 Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strikingly, the role of this chemical communication observed in marine invertebrate sperm (which is reminiscent of bacterial chemotaxis (14)) is uncertain in the navigation of mammalian sperm (13, 15–19). In contrast, in vitro/vivo evidence suggests that the navigation of mammalian sperm within the female reproductive tract depends more on fluid mechanical clues rather than other external stimuli (2, 7, 9, 20, 21).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, boundary-dependent navigation that relies upon the hydrodynamic interactions of the swimmer with rigid walls, as well as self-propulsion and steric repulsion of sperm cells (25), is independent of the external flow and exists even in a quiescent medium. In fact, boundary-dependent navigation consists of a far-field hydrodynamic attraction of the sperm toward nearby walls (26–29), such as those of the female reproductive tract, followed by stably swimming along these boundaries (20, 21, 37, 22, 30–36). Berke et al (27) proposed a dipole swimmer model that describes the attraction of sperm as a microswimmer with absolute progressive motility toward rigid boundaries at distances far enough from the boundaries (i.e., the far-field approximation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%