Stringent containment measures without complete city lockdown to achieve low incidence and mortality across two waves of COVID-19 in Hong Kong

Abstract

IntroductionAn international city, Hong Kong, in proximity to the first epicentre of COVID- 19, experienced two epidemic waves with different importation pressure. We compared the epidemiological features of patients with COVID-19 in the context of containment policies between the first and second waves.MethodsWe retrieved information on the first 1038 cases detected in Hong Kong (23 January to 25 April 2020) to analyse the epidemiological characteristics including age/gender-specific incidence, clustering, reproduction number (Rt) and containment delay; in relation to the containment measures implemented. Factors associated with containment delay were evaluated by multiple linear regression analysis with age, gender, epidemic wave and infection source as covariates. A time series of 5-day moving average was plotted to examine the changes across the two epidemic waves.ResultsThe incidence and mortality (135.5 and 0.5 per 1 000 000 population) was among the lowest in the world. Aggressive escalation of border control correlated with reductions in Rt from 1.35 to 0.57 and 0.92 to 0.18, and aversions of 450 and 1650 local infections during the first and second waves, respectively. Implementing COVID-19 tests for overseas returners correlated with an upsurge of asymptomatic case detection, and shortened containment delay in the second wave. Medium-sized cluster events in the first wave were family gatherings, whereas those in the second wave were leisure activities among youngsters. Containment delay was associated with older age (adjusted OR (AOR)=1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.040), male gender (AOR=1.41, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.96, p=0.039) and local cases (AOR=11.18, 95% CI 7.43 to 16.83, p<0.001), and with significant improvement in the second wave compared with the first wave (average: 6.8 vs 3.7 days). A higher incidence rate was observed for males, raising possibility of gender predilection in susceptibility of developing symptoms.ConclusionPrompt and stringent all-round containment strategies represent successful measures in pandemic control. These findings could inform formulation and implementation of pandemic mitigation strategies.

COVID-19, community response, public policy, and travel patterns: A tale of Hong Kong

“…At the time of writing, the city has never been locked down, and inhabitants have always enjoyed a moderate level of mobility. Compared with other places, such as Singapore, Seoul, London, and Tokyo, Hong Kong has been relatively successful in terms of controlling the rate of infections ( Lam et al, 2020 ; Wong et al, 2020a ; 2020b , 2020c ). Comparative discussions of COVID-19-related policies and societal responses have largely focused on the collective memories of combating the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003.…”

“…A series of large-scale physical-distancing intervention measures enacted by the Hong Kong government, in addition to prior experiences of virus prevention, made efforts to convince individuals to comply with precautionary measures, such as wearing face masks and washing hands, more effective. This made the government and people believe that it remained possible to maintain daily activities and travel amid the COVID-19 pandemic ( Kwok et al, 2020 ; Wong et al, 2020 ). However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been little research on the relationship between government public policies and community responses, although this could help us better understand how the community and government can work together to combat COVID-19 and similar pandemic events.…”

COVID-19 in Germany and China: mitigation versus elimination strategy

“…The COVID-19 epidemic in Hong Kong was characterized by several waves of imported cases followed by limited local transmissions [ 41 , 42 ]. The city authorities had applied immediate, strong and successful containment measures, including an aggressive escalation of border control, and a public health response facilitated by the experience with the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in 2003 [ 43 ].…”

Disagreements and Conflicts between Scientists and the Crisis of Legitimate Authority: The Case of French New Lockdown in November 2020

“…No reliable answer could be given. From then on, the experts' words were durably altered, and the result could only be a succession of denials and questioning of the discourse, to the point of a pure and simple refusal of the (collective) rules of the "lockdown game", even though scientific investigations confirm the link between a strict lockdown policy and slowing the spread of the coronavirus (Atalan, 2020;Pachetti et al, 2020;Wong et al, 2020).…”