2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2012.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stripe structures in the t–t′-J model

Abstract: Here, based upon density matrix renormalization group calculations, we discuss the structure of the stripes found in the doped t-t ′ -J model and the physics that underlies their formation.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect has been efficiently captured by density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations of the t-J model on finite systems [52][53][54]. These calculations yield a charge density of ∼0.5 hole/site, consistent with experiment.…”
Section: Pseudogapmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This effect has been efficiently captured by density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations of the t-J model on finite systems [52][53][54]. These calculations yield a charge density of ∼0.5 hole/site, consistent with experiment.…”
Section: Pseudogapmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In hole doping, there is a ferromagnetic spin arrangement across the charge stripes, resulting in antiphase spin structures [13,14]. Figure 2 shows N (q, ω) along the (0, 0)-(π, 0) direction for both hole and electron dopings.…”
Section: Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the two separated branches obtained with our dynamical DMRG calculations indicate the presence of ferromagnetic effective interaction along the perpendicular direction of the charge stripes. The presence of effective ferromagnetic interaction is evidenced by ferromagnetically aligned spins in the hole-rich region [13,14].…”
Section: Heisenberg Model [Purple Lines In Figs 3(a) and 3(b)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is to be expected on symmetry grounds that a nematic order [25] will be more robust and may coexist with disordered stripes [26], microscopic studies so far have focused on either finite Q ordering of spin and charge stripe phenomena [27][28][29][30][31][32] or = Q 0 IUC nematic phenomena [14,17,[33][34][35][36][37][38]. Moreover, since simple Hartree-Fock mean-field theories incorrectly predict insulating period-8 stripes [27][28][29][30], the present theoretical understanding of the experimentally observed metallic period-4 charge stripes at doping = x 1 8 [2] is dependent upon elaborate variational numerical studies [31,[39][40][41][42][43] or the scenario of Coulomb-frustrated phase separation [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%