2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Striped Blandford/Znajek jets from advection of small-scale magnetic field

Abstract: ABSTRACT Black hole – accretion disc systems are the central engines of relativistic jets from stellar to galactic scales. We numerically quantify the unsteady outgoing Poynting flux through the horizon of a rapidly spinning black hole endowed with a rotating accretion disc. The disc supports small-scale, concentric, flux tubes with zero net magnetic flux. Our general relativistic force-free electrodynamics simulations follow the accretion on to the black hole ov… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(220 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following sections, we address the similarities and differences between numerical and physical resistivity in FFE. The aim of this discussion is to provide support for the interpretation of the numerical dissipation found in astrophysical applications of our code (Mahlmann et al 2019(Mahlmann et al , 2020) as a consistent model of physical dissipation. Along the way, we may also contribute to asses whether suitably extended FFE models (including physical dissipation, albeit not at the astrophysically expected levels) may be used to study a number of dissipative processes in relativistic astrophysics, for example, resistive solutions for pulsar magnetospheres (Li et al 2012), the dissipation induced by the kink instability in relativistic jets (Bromberg et al 2019), or the conversion between fast and Alfvén modes (Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the following sections, we address the similarities and differences between numerical and physical resistivity in FFE. The aim of this discussion is to provide support for the interpretation of the numerical dissipation found in astrophysical applications of our code (Mahlmann et al 2019(Mahlmann et al , 2020) as a consistent model of physical dissipation. Along the way, we may also contribute to asses whether suitably extended FFE models (including physical dissipation, albeit not at the astrophysically expected levels) may be used to study a number of dissipative processes in relativistic astrophysics, for example, resistive solutions for pulsar magnetospheres (Li et al 2012), the dissipation induced by the kink instability in relativistic jets (Bromberg et al 2019), or the conversion between fast and Alfvén modes (Li et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…We note that for resolutions of fewer than eight points per wavelength, the values of the numerical resistivity are not too different. This justifies our choice of a fourth-order accurate discretization of j || (Mahlmann et al 2019(Mahlmann et al , 2020 in combination with MP7. The resolution employed in these global 3D models is smaller than p ∼ 8 zones per wavelength.…”
Section: Diffusion Of 1d Plasma Wavesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Asada et al 2002;Gómez et al 2008;Gabuzda et al 2014). Systematic changes in the signs of these gradients, leading to RM sign reversals in unresolved measurements, can be explained with a number of models, including the magnetic "tower" model (Lynden-Bell 1996; Contopoulos & Kazanas 1998;Lico et al 2017), or the "striped" jet model (Parfrey et al 2015;Mahlmann et al 2020;Nathanail et al 2020). Nevertheless, it remains difficult to explain the rapid fluctuations observed in 2017 April with these models.…”
Section: Location Of the Faraday Screen: Internal Versus Externalmentioning
confidence: 99%