2015
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stroke in the TOTAL trial: a randomized trial of routine thrombectomy vs. percutaneous coronary intervention alone in ST elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract: Thrombectomy was associated with a significant increase in stroke. Based on these findings, future trials must carefully collect stroke to determine safety in addition to efficacy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[223][224][225][226] A safety concern emerged in TOTAL (Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy with PCI versus PCI Alone in Patients with STEMI) trial with an increase in the risk of stroke. 225,227 Taken together, these results suggest that the routine use of thrombus aspiration is not indicated. In the high-thrombus burden subgroup, the trend towards reduced cardiovascular death and increased stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) provides a rationale for future trials of improved thrombus aspiration technologies in this high-risk subgroup (although statistical tests did not support significant subgroup interaction).…”
Section: Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[223][224][225][226] A safety concern emerged in TOTAL (Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy with PCI versus PCI Alone in Patients with STEMI) trial with an increase in the risk of stroke. 225,227 Taken together, these results suggest that the routine use of thrombus aspiration is not indicated. In the high-thrombus burden subgroup, the trend towards reduced cardiovascular death and increased stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) provides a rationale for future trials of improved thrombus aspiration technologies in this high-risk subgroup (although statistical tests did not support significant subgroup interaction).…”
Section: Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…9,27 A previously published detailed analysis of the strokes in the TOTAL trial showed a significant increase in strokes-mainly ischaemic-in the first 48 h. 27 A potential mechanism of stroke related to thrombectomy is embolisation of thrombus to systemic circulation during removal of the thrombectomy catheter. A landmark analysis showed no difference in late strokes beyond 180 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 Concerns over increased stent thrombosis rates with drugeluting stent use have not materialised, with newer generation drug-eluting stents being shown to be both safer and more efficacious than bare metal stents in the PPCI setting. 26 Finally, the debate over treatment of non-culprit 'bystander' lesions continues: 30-50% of STEMI patients have significant multivessel disease 27 and current guidelines advocate revascularisation of non-culprit lesions during the index PPCI procedure only in patients who are haemodynamically unstable, or have ongoing ischaemia despite successful culprit vessel PPCI.…”
Section: Ppci: Procedural Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%