1986
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.17.3.358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stroke outcome research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in agreement with the general assumption about the speed of neurological (and with that, functional) recovery after stroke (ie, the largest improvements are observed early after stroke onset and these changes subsequently gradually level off). 3,6,22 However, in part, gradual smaller change scores over time may have been the result of the availability of a reduced range for changes (ceiling effect).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in agreement with the general assumption about the speed of neurological (and with that, functional) recovery after stroke (ie, the largest improvements are observed early after stroke onset and these changes subsequently gradually level off). 3,6,22 However, in part, gradual smaller change scores over time may have been the result of the availability of a reduced range for changes (ceiling effect).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] According to Gresham, time itself appears to be one of the most important, although neglected, factors in our understanding of functional recovery after stroke. 6 To date, no study has been published that investigated the longitudinal time-dependent relationship between recovery of impairments, such as strength, synergism, visuospatial inattention, and recovery of disabilities such as gait after stroke. As a consequence, the impact of these changes as a function of time on regaining independent gait after stroke is not well understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gresham (1986) described spontaneous recovery as being "spontaneous return of some degree of neurological function" which is thought to be completed by six months post stroke. Gresham explained that this "recovery" may be marginal or dramatic.…”
Section: Spontaneous Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 The pattern of motor function recovery: till date, neurological recovery after stroke is not fully understood. 42,43 Although, various mechanisms have been propounded like vicariation of function theory suggesting that the lesion area retrieves by tissue repair and its function is taken over by other cortical and subcortical structures, either adjacent to or remote from the discredited area, and this process is known as resolution of diaschisis. 44,45 Thus, it may be inferred that diaschisis and vicariation of function was initiated due to the inherent actions of the trial drugs such as resolvent, morcellator, attenuant, brain and nerve tonic and stimulant, and as a result, the improvement in ADL of participants with post stroke disability was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%