Stroke survivors' perspectives on recovering in rural and remote Australia: A systematic mixed studies review

Abstract

Introduction Stroke survivors recovering in rural and remote locations often have little or no access to rehabilitation services. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on recovering in rural and remote Australia, from the perspective of stroke survivors. Use of technology to support recovery was also explored. Methods A systematic mixed studies review was conducted and reported according to the ENTREQ and PRISMA statements. MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, PsycINFO (ProQuest), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched from inception to May 2021 for studies investigating stroke survivors' perspectives on recovering in rural or remote Australia. Qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods studies were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Studies were not excluded or weighted according to methodological quality. To review the perspectives of stroke survivors on recovering, findings of included studies were mapped to the Living My Life framework and integrated using a convergent qualitative synthesis. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017064990). Results Eight studies met the inclusion criteria: six qualitative, one quantitative and one mixed methods. Methodological quality of the small number of studies ranged from low to high, indicating further high‐quality research is needed. Included studies involved 152 stroke survivors in total. Review findings indicated that recovering was driven by working towards what mattered to stroke survivors, in ways that matched their beliefs and preferences and that worked for them in their world, including use of technology. Conclusion Stroke survivors recovering in rural and remote locations want to live their life by doing what matters to them, despite the challenges they face. They want support in ways that work for them in their environment. Further research is required to tailor support for stroke survivors that is specific to their life in rural and remote locations.

Younger Women’s Experiences of Stroke: A Qualitative Study

“…Based on participants in this study, access to health care for those stroke patients living in rural areas is still an issue. This finding also confirms a 2022 study that found stroke survivors in rural and remote areas want to live well, doing what matters to them, despite their challenges and possible isolation (S. M. Jackson et al, 2021). Young stroke survivors endorsed online service delivery as a preferred method to solve the unmet needs of living with stroke (Keating et al, 2021).…”

Understanding the Experiences of Rural- and Remote-Living Patients Accessing Sub-Acute Care in Queensland: A Qualitative Descriptive Analysi-

“…Both in the current findings and the existing literature, there remains a significant degree of hesitancy associated with receiving care outside of metropolitan locations, 30 often founded on the notion that services offered in rural sites will “fall short” compared to services offered in metropolitan facilities. 31 Despite this, most patients were ultimately satisfied with their care and transition outcomes after transitioning rural. This suggests that a vital part of improving equitable access to health care in non-metropolitan regions may start with taking steps to offset patient apprehension and hesitancy about transitioning rural.…”

The Role of Deep Brain Stimulation in the Recovery of Stroke Patients

“…The post-stroke dystonia is thought to result from Finally, DBS PLIC may act on nearby thalamic neurons, influencing thalamic reticular cells and/or modulating neuronal activity of thalamic relay cells to alter motor circuitry through thalamocortical signalling [7].…”