“…Importantly, echocardiography has been shown to assess fluid responsiveness by viewing the internal structure and the blood flow of the heart and great vessels and to guide fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients [ 1 , 2 ]. Unfortunately, both the compression of the inferior vena cava by the pregnant uterus and the technical difficulty in identifying by ultrasound limit the widespread use of the respiratory variability of deep abdominal and thoracic veins, such as superior vena cava (SVC) to predict fluid reactivity during cesarean section [ 3 , 4 ]. Interestingly, present evidence has shown that when compared with respiratory variability of inferior vena cava diameter (IVC-CI), respiratory variability of internal jugular vein variability (IJV-CI) and subclavian vein (SCV-CI) appear to be the suitable metrics of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with sepsis and acute circulatory failure [ 1 , 5 , 6 ].…”