2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4311-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong and conductive reduced graphene oxide-MXene porous films for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1e and f, respectively, showing that MXene nanosheets with a thickness of about 3 nm were prepared after the Al phase in the MAX raw material was successfully etched. Owing to its great water dispersibility, 59,60 MXene is predominately distributed in the continuous NR phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1e and f, respectively, showing that MXene nanosheets with a thickness of about 3 nm were prepared after the Al phase in the MAX raw material was successfully etched. Owing to its great water dispersibility, 59,60 MXene is predominately distributed in the continuous NR phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer materials 12–16 are more lightweight, flexible, easy to process, and have excellent corrosion resistance. However, most of the polymer materials are non-conductive, and it is difficult to achieve high conductivity even with the addition of carbon nanotubes, 17,18 carbon fibers, 19,20 graphene 21–24 and other conductive fillers. Therefore, the combination of electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity of the material with light weight, easy processing, and excellent anti-corrosion performance is a competitive research direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b). For instance, the SE t of the MGM-7 film was as high as 83 429 dB cm −1 , which is superior to the values of well-studied metal-based, carbon-based, and MXene-based composites, 28–30,35,36,48,77–93 and is among the best values when taking the tensile strength of materials into consideration at the same time (Fig. 5d and Table S4, ESI†).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%