2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01252.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong correlation between isoprene emission and gross photosynthetic capacity during leaf phenology of the tropical tree species Hymenaea courbaril with fundamental changes in volatile organic compounds emission composition during early leaf development

Abstract: Changes of the volatile organic compounds (VOC) emission capacity and composition of different developmental stages of the tropical tree species Hymenaea courbaril were investigated under field conditions at a remote Amazonian rainforest site. The basal emission capacity of isoprene changed considerably over the course of leaf development, from young to mature and to senescent leaves, ultimately spanning a wide range of observed isoprene basal emission capacities from 0.7 to 111.5 m m m m g C g ---during the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
96
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
8
96
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They attribute the emission difference to higher emission rates from young mature leaves at the end of the dry season when compared to emission rates from older mature leaves present at the end of the wet season. The isoprene emission rates of different leaf developmental stages were well correlated with the leaf's gross photosynthetic capacity (Kuhn et al, 2004b). They also discuss a potential impact of long-term temperature conditions preceding both campaigns.…”
Section: Global and Regional Totals Of Other Speciesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They attribute the emission difference to higher emission rates from young mature leaves at the end of the dry season when compared to emission rates from older mature leaves present at the end of the wet season. The isoprene emission rates of different leaf developmental stages were well correlated with the leaf's gross photosynthetic capacity (Kuhn et al, 2004b). They also discuss a potential impact of long-term temperature conditions preceding both campaigns.…”
Section: Global and Regional Totals Of Other Speciesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As HCHO is a principal atmospheric isoprene oxidation product, these patterns have been interpreted as a seasonal isoprene emission low, arising from a lag between substantial new leaf area growth (which takes place during that period of the year and continues well into the dry season; Huete et al, 2006;Myneni et al, 2007) and the delayed onset of isoprene emission in newly-developed leaves. However, in warm growth environments, the period between onset of photosynthesis and isoprene emissions in newly-emerging foliage has been found to be short (Kuhn et al, 2004;Wiberley et al, 2005), lags on the order of weeks may thus be difficult to fully reconcile with the process of leaf growth alone. Leaf isoprene emissions (normalised)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be related to the temperature, which was approximately 3 • C higher during the second part of the campaign (Fares et al, 2009), and the more advanced phenological state of the plants in the flux footprint area. Isoprene emission is known to be dependent on leaf development (Wiberley et al, 2005) and monoterpene emission from deciduous broad leafed trees exhibit the same developmental behaviour (Hakola et al, 1998;Kuhn et al, 2004).…”
Section: Bvoc Mixing Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basal emission rates calculated between 20 to 27 May showed isoprene rates of 511 µg m −2 h −1 a and monoterpene rates of 1490 µg m −2 h −1 while the period after the storm, from 28 May to 3 June had emission rates of 1010 µg m −2 h −1 for isoprene and 3290 µg m −2 h −1 for monoterpenes. This increase in the basal emission rate throughout the measurements period may reflect the physiological state of the plants as they developed over the months (Kuhn et al, 2004). Fares et al (2009) from leaf and plant emission measurements made during the second part of this study calculated an isoprene emissioin rate of 79 µg m −2 h −1 and a monoterpene emission rate of 1199 µg m −2 h −1 while Owen et al (1997) a bottom up approach for calculating an area basal emission rate is highly dependent upon the plant species selected and the estimation of coverage over the area which may explain the large difference between the isoprene emission potential of Fares et al (2009) and that calculated from our flux rate approach.…”
Section: Bvoc Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%