2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.054409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong coupling between whispering gallery modes and chromium ions in ruby

Abstract: We report the study of interactions between cavity photons and paramagnetic Cr 3+ spins in a ruby (Cr 3+ :Al2O3) Whispering Gallery mode (WGM) resonator. Examining the system at microwave frequencies and millikelvin temperatures, spin-photon couplings up to 610 MHz or about 5% of photon energy are observed between the impurity spins and high quality factor (Q > 10 5 ) WGM. Large tunability and spin-spin interaction allows operation in the strong coupling regime. The system exhibits behaviour not predicted by t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown previously [5] that a standard model of two interacting harmonic oscillators can accurately determine the coupling values from such avoided crossings. However, we observe strong distortion around 0 T, and also an asymmetry of the mode splittings about the central magnon resonances due to the ultrastrong coupling of the photon modes to the magnon modes, as was observed previously in Ruby [29]. There-Frequency (GHz) Magnetic Field (T) 3 4 5 6 7…”
Section: Experimental Observationssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown previously [5] that a standard model of two interacting harmonic oscillators can accurately determine the coupling values from such avoided crossings. However, we observe strong distortion around 0 T, and also an asymmetry of the mode splittings about the central magnon resonances due to the ultrastrong coupling of the photon modes to the magnon modes, as was observed previously in Ruby [29]. There-Frequency (GHz) Magnetic Field (T) 3 4 5 6 7…”
Section: Experimental Observationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In order to investigate this regime we use common microwave spectroscopy techniques [5,23,[25][26][27][28] to directly observe the mode splitting caused by the magnon interaction to determine the coupling values. Similar systems have been extensively utilised not only in the field of spintronics to investigate the interaction between microwave photons and paramagnetic spin ensembles [25][26][27][28][29], but also to realise optical comb generation [30], ultra-low threshold lasing [31] measurement of optomechanical systems [32,33], and extremely stable cryogenic sapphire oscillator clock technology [34,35]. To date, exciting internal, highly-confined photonic modes in a YIG sphere has only recently been demonstrated in the optical regime using Whispering Gallery Modes (WGM) [10,11] but has never before been achieved in the microwave domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sample in the system frame (Farr et al 2014b), where the binary is parametrised by the masses and spin magnitudes of the two component BHs {mi} and {χi}, the spin misalignment angles {θi}, the angle ∆Φ between the projections of the two spins on the orbital plane, and the angle β between the total and orbital angular momentum vectors. We find, in agreement with similar studies such as Littenberg et al (2015) and , that there is a strong preference for detecting GWs from nearly faceon binaries, since GW emission is strongest perpendicular to the orbital plane.…”
Section: Signal Analysis and Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is E-mail: c.matthews@uchicago.edu particularly true when the low-probability tails of the distribution contribute significantly to the integral of eq. 1 and when π(x) is multi-modal, as is often the case in astrophysical applications in multi-dimensional spaces (e.g., Farr et al 2014). For example, in sampling a Bayesian posterior in a statistical analysis, one may be interested in robust determination of credible regions up to highlevels (e.g., 99.99%) to evaluate the level of discrepancy with theoretical prediction or with another measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%