2014
DOI: 10.1109/lmag.2014.2379721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Eddy-Current Shielding of Ferromagnetic Resonance Response in Sub-Skin-Depth-Thick Conducting Magnetic Multilayers

Abstract: Exchange-coupled non-magnetic metal (NM) and ferromagnetic metal (FM) multilayers are crucial for microwave magnonic and spintronic devices. These layered materials usually have total thicknesses smaller than the microwave skin depth. By using a stripline broadband ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy technique, we experimentally demonstrate that the amplitude of the magnetisation precession in the FM layer is strongly diminished by the shielding effect of microwave (6-12 GHz) eddy currents circulating in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical predictions made in Ref. [203] were confirmed experimentally by conducting BFMR measurements of Cu [172]. The samples are placed on top of a 0.33 mm-wide microwave stripline (the capping layer side faces the stripline) and the FMR absorption is measured with a VNA.…”
Section: Fig 39mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretical predictions made in Ref. [203] were confirmed experimentally by conducting BFMR measurements of Cu [172]. The samples are placed on top of a 0.33 mm-wide microwave stripline (the capping layer side faces the stripline) and the FMR absorption is measured with a VNA.…”
Section: Fig 39mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The substrate thickness is usually large which leads to a negligible contribution of the electric shielding to the total shielding effect. This was confirmed in [172] by rigorous finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations [173]. The simulations showed that the microwave current in the sample sitting on top of a microstrip line flows in the opposite direction to the one in the microstrip.…”
Section: Shielding Of the Microwave Electromagnetic Field Of Striplinmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, from the analogy with Fig. 1(b) in [52] one may expect that the eddy currents and hence the total microwave magnetic field is larger in the Fe layer than in the Permalloy one. Since the magnetization precession in metallic materials is driven by the total microwave magnetic field [46], one may expect that the microwave driving field is stronger in the Fe layer than in the Permalloy one.…”
Section: B Most General Details Of the Theory Of The Magnetization Dmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The microwave conductivity contribution to the stripline broadband ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) response of highly-conducting (metallic) magnetic multilayers and nanostructures of sub-skin-depth thicknesses has attracted significant attention in recent years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. It has been shown that these effects are important when the microwave magnetic field is incident on only one of the two surfaces of a planar metallic material (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%