2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong equality of Roman and weak Roman domination in trees

Abstract: We provide a constructive characterization of the trees for which the Roman domination number strongly equals the weak Roman domination number, that is, for which every weak Roman dominating function of minimum weight is a Roman dominating function. Our characterization is based on five simple extension operations, and reveals several structural properties of these trees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar constructive characterizations of trees for different domination related parameters or properties have been presented in e.g. Alvarado et al (2016), Henning and Klostermeyer (2017), Henning and Marcon (2016), and Rad (2017). Our characterization is based on four simple operations.…”
Section: Corollary 6 Let G = ((A B) E G ) Be a Connected Bipartite supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Similar constructive characterizations of trees for different domination related parameters or properties have been presented in e.g. Alvarado et al (2016), Henning and Klostermeyer (2017), Henning and Marcon (2016), and Rad (2017). Our characterization is based on four simple operations.…”
Section: Corollary 6 Let G = ((A B) E G ) Be a Connected Bipartite supporting
confidence: 52%
“…In this paper we show that for a given graph G, it is NP-hard to decide whether γ p R (G) = γ R (G) and also in the next we provide a constructive characterization of trees T with γ p R (T ) ≡ γ R (T ). Further examples of characterizations of tress can be found in [1,2,3,4,13,16,17,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of an RDF f is w( f ) = f (V(G)) = ∑ u∈V(G) f (u). We denote by γ R (G) the minimum weight of an RDF of G. It is called the the Roman domination number of G. For some further results on Roman dominating function in graphs, we recommend the reader to consult the papers [4][5][6][7]. RDFs are useful in the study of generalized k-core percolation [8], where V 2 = α-removable, V 0 = β-removable, and V 1 = non-removable vertices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, finding the weak Roman domination number for some special classes of graphs as well as finding some good bounds for this invariant is of great importance. For some recent results on the weak Roman domination number of graphs we refer the interested reader to the papers [4,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation