2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-013-0455-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong force networks in granular mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
8
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5b), the α decreases while the β increases until FC * is reached (Table 3). At fines content below critical, the larger grains provide the active force chain [27], and increases in FC act to disrupt the direct contacts between large particles [43]; the stiffness of soils is determined by both the nature of the interparticle contacts and the interparticle coordination number [8,23]. Consequently, increasing the fines content decreases the interparticle contacts and coordination number between large particles, resulting in a decreasing α with increasing FC (i.e., a decrease in the stiffness of the mixture).…”
Section: The Variations Of α-Factors and β-Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b), the α decreases while the β increases until FC * is reached (Table 3). At fines content below critical, the larger grains provide the active force chain [27], and increases in FC act to disrupt the direct contacts between large particles [43]; the stiffness of soils is determined by both the nature of the interparticle contacts and the interparticle coordination number [8,23]. Consequently, increasing the fines content decreases the interparticle contacts and coordination number between large particles, resulting in a decreasing α with increasing FC (i.e., a decrease in the stiffness of the mixture).…”
Section: The Variations Of α-Factors and β-Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong network is the main contributor to the deviator, whereas the weak network contributes to the isotropic component. A recent numerical study on imperfect binary mixtures, with particle size ratios (PSRs) up to 10 and higher, under uniaxial confined compression, considered the cumulative contribution to the deviator of the different contact-type networks (coarseto-coarse (c-c), coarse-to-fine (c-f) and fine-to-fine (f-f)), showing that contributions were dependent on the fines content (Minh et al, 2014). This paper uses the discrete-element method (DEM) to further extend previous numerical work on gap-graded materials to axisymmetric stress conditions, namely, triaxial test configuration, considered the most relevant conventional laboratory method to replicate stress field conditions in soil mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress-strain-strength response of silty sands is highly dependent on the involvement of both coarse and fine constituents in the load carrying microstructure of the mixture (e.g., [61,66]). For silt contents less than a particular threshold value known as the threshold fines content (i.e., FC th ), strong force networks of the load carrying microstructure mainly pass through the coarse particles that are dynamically in contact with each others.…”
Section: Equivalent Intergranular Void Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well recognized that the liquefaction susceptibility is greatly influenced by sand initial state (taking into account the combined influence of density and mean principal effective stress) [4,35,37,76,89], shearing mode [8,62,98], and the overall particles shape [8,10,92]. Moreover, in particle scale, anisotropic microstructure of granular packing defined in terms of the statistical arrangement of particles and their associated contacts, as well as the general pattern of interaction between individual particles and their involvement in evolving force transmitting chains have central roles in soil shear strength and volume change response [19,51,52,61,66,80]. Based on the results of triaxial, simple shear, and hollow cylinder tests, the undrained (i.e., constant volume) stressstrain behavior of sandy soils can be categorized into three distinct types, as described below (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%