1997
DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relationships for Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

23
411
4
21

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 592 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
23
411
4
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Five [Atkinson and Boore, 2003, Crouse, 1991, García et al, 2005, Lin and Lee, 2008, McVerry et al, 2006 out of the eight selected models are ranked in the lowest capability class (D) by the method of Scherbaum et al [2004] and only one model, that of Kanno et al [2006], is ranked higher than C. The results for the GMPEs of Atkinson and Boore [2003], Crouse [1991] and Youngs et al [1997] are in agreement with those presented by Douglas et al [2006] based on their smaller dataset.…”
Section: Data Selectedsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Five [Atkinson and Boore, 2003, Crouse, 1991, García et al, 2005, Lin and Lee, 2008, McVerry et al, 2006 out of the eight selected models are ranked in the lowest capability class (D) by the method of Scherbaum et al [2004] and only one model, that of Kanno et al [2006], is ranked higher than C. The results for the GMPEs of Atkinson and Boore [2003], Crouse [1991] and Youngs et al [1997] are in agreement with those presented by Douglas et al [2006] based on their smaller dataset.…”
Section: Data Selectedsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…All the selected models underestimate the groundmotion variability observed in the Lesser Antilles (shown by values of STDNR greater than unity) although for the models of Kanno et al [2006] and Youngs et al [1997] this underestimation of the variability is small (in fact, these models predict larger variabilities for intraslab events than observed). As discussed by Douglas et al [2006] the reasons for the apparently poor match between predictions and observations could be partly due to an observational dataset from a different magnitude and distance range than used by the developers of the selected GMPEs.…”
Section: Data Selectedmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations