2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02561.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a Tasmanian wet sclerophyll forest as revealed by DNA barcoding and taxon‐specific primers

Abstract: Summary• Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbiosis is a widespread plant nutrition strategy in Australia, especially in semiarid regions. This study aims to determine the diversity, community structure and host preference of ECM fungi in a Tasmanian wet sclerophyll forest.• Ectomycorrhizal fungi were identified based on anatomotyping and rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-large subunit (LSU) sequence analysis using taxon-specific primers. Host tree roots were identified based on root morphology and length difference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
281
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 372 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
21
281
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the significance of host effects would depend on spatial scales and host composition within a stand. Our stand-scale analyses detected significant host effects at some sites, especially in gymnosperm-angiosperm mixed forests (Miyamoto,unpublished data;Supplementary Table S3), as in many previous studies (Ishida et al, 2007;Tedersoo et al, 2008;Smith et al, 2009). However, most EM fungi are assumed to be host generalists (Bruns et al, 2002), which is supported by numerous studies (Kennedy et al, 2003;Roy et al, 2008;Trocha et al, 2012;Bahram et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the significance of host effects would depend on spatial scales and host composition within a stand. Our stand-scale analyses detected significant host effects at some sites, especially in gymnosperm-angiosperm mixed forests (Miyamoto,unpublished data;Supplementary Table S3), as in many previous studies (Ishida et al, 2007;Tedersoo et al, 2008;Smith et al, 2009). However, most EM fungi are assumed to be host generalists (Bruns et al, 2002), which is supported by numerous studies (Kennedy et al, 2003;Roy et al, 2008;Trocha et al, 2012;Bahram et al, 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The host plant is regarded as one of the most important factors that influences EM fungal composition, especially at the stand scale, where hosts coexist in relatively narrow spatial and environmental ranges (Kennedy et al, 2003;Richard et al, 2005;Ishida et al, 2007;Tedersoo et al, 2008;Smith et al, 2009;Murata et al, 2013). However, isolating the host effect at larger spatial scales is difficult because the host composition changes with climatic conditions and geological history .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, analysis of DNA sequences has been incorporated to establish phylogenetic relationships among groups and to aid species delimitation [8][9][10][11][12]. Nowadays, efforts have been made to seek a short, standardized, and universal gene marker for rapid species identification of diverse groups of fungi [5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. So far, a single universal DNA barcode for fungi has not been obtained [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28S rRNA gene amplification used concatemers containing the fungal-specific LROR (Tedersoo et al, 2008), an 8-bp multiplex tag, and the 454 'B' adaptor (in the forward direction) and the complimentary primer LR5F (Tedersoo et al, 2008) with the 454 'A' adaptor (in the reverse direction). Following an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 3 min, PCR was cycled 35 times at 95°C for 30 s, 54°C for 45 s, 72°C for 50 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.…”
Section: Microbial Community Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%