2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.86.062109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Kochen-Specker theorem and incomputability of quantum randomness

Abstract: The Kochen-Specker theorem shows the impossibility for a hidden variable theory to consistently assign values to certain (finite) sets of observables in a way that is non-contextual and consistent with quantum mechanics. If we require non-contextuality, the consequence is that many observables must not have pre-existing definite values. However, the Kochen-Specker theorem does not allow one to determine which observables must be value indefinite. In this paper we present an improvement on the Kochen-Specker th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
154
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, confining the contextuality serves to simplify its experimental observation. Such a simplification not only raises interesting foundational questions [26], but may also suggest future quantum information processing applications [3,6]. Additionally two single intensities with one or the other beam blocked are recorded (I z± ), and again background measurements with orthogonal preparation and postselection states are performed and subtracted from the signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, confining the contextuality serves to simplify its experimental observation. Such a simplification not only raises interesting foundational questions [26], but may also suggest future quantum information processing applications [3,6]. Additionally two single intensities with one or the other beam blocked are recorded (I z± ), and again background measurements with orthogonal preparation and postselection states are performed and subtracted from the signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is one of the most counterintuitive aspects of quantum mechanics, and finds itself at the heart of recent quantum information processing applications [3][4][5][6][7][8]. The BKS theorem is proved by exhibiting a BKS-set of observables [9,10] that contains geometrically related and mutually commuting subsets (or measurement contexts) that result in a logical incompatibility: Any noncontextual hidden variable theory (NCHVT) that pre-assigns eigenvalues globally to the entire BKS-set (i.e., noncontextually) results in a contradiction with the predictions of quantum mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the Bell-type certification schemes can be regarded as random expanders rather than generators due to the requirement of "a small private random seed" to operate [6,9,10]. Finally, the random number generators certified by Bell inequalities utilize no-signaling assumption and is, therefore, inherently a non-local device which is challenging to use for practical applications.To address this problem, a different approach to QRNG certification based on the Kochen-Specker theorem and contextual measurements has recently been proposed [9]. It does not allow certification of the data in a device-independent fashion like the CHSH inequality, but yields a rigorous theoretical proof of measurements outcomes being value-indefinite even in the presence of experimental imperfections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, randomness, in all existing physical and computational theories, may be understood as unpredictability w.r.to the intended theory. It is thus a form of (in time) undecidability w.r.to the given (more or less) formal frame (see Calude and Longo 2015;Abbott et al 2012;Gács et al 2011 for analyses in relation to algorithmic randomness). In other words, the (joint) analysis of (algorithmic, physical and biological) randomness crucially helps to go beyond formal deductions and computations, as given by conventional theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%