2010
DOI: 10.1214/09-aihp311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong law of large numbers for fragmentation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Ext c is the event that the system does not become extinct, |X t | denotes the number of particles at time t and f is a bounded, continuous function. This is indeed the case as follows from [17]. In Theorem 3.1 we obtain (3) for a slightly more general class of functions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…where Ext c is the event that the system does not become extinct, |X t | denotes the number of particles at time t and f is a bounded, continuous function. This is indeed the case as follows from [17]. In Theorem 3.1 we obtain (3) for a slightly more general class of functions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For example, they have since been extended to more general branching diffusions in Engländer et al [14] and to fragmentation processes in Harris et al [31]. More classical techniques based on the expectation semigroup are simply not able to generalize easily, since they often require either some a priori bounds on the semigroup or involve difficult estimates -for example, in Harris and Williams [28] their important bound of a non-linear term is made possible only by the existence of a good L 2 theory for their operator, and this is not generally available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where t (n) 2 is defined as above. Bearing in mind that |g| ≤ 1 it follows from the DCT in conjunction with (18) and (23), respectively, that which completes the proof, since t ∈ C u(·,x) .…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…holds for each h > 0, where conditionally on F h theÑ (·) t and B (n) are independent copies of N (·) t and B n , respectively. Furthermore, note that (18)…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%