1990
DOI: 10.2307/1368741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong Neighbor-Stranger Discrimination in Song Sparrows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[29][30][31]. A long-term mimicry advantage in our population is unlikely, however, given our finding that long-term neighbors can recognize one another on the basis of a single song type (32,33). Second, song sharing may provide an advantage in our population to a young bird in cooperative interactions with neighbors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[29][30][31]. A long-term mimicry advantage in our population is unlikely, however, given our finding that long-term neighbors can recognize one another on the basis of a single song type (32,33). Second, song sharing may provide an advantage in our population to a young bird in cooperative interactions with neighbors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As such, Stoddard et al (1992) concluded that the earlier studies did not demonstrate neighbor/stranger discrimination because both stimuli were perceived as relatively equal threats anywhere inside a male's territory. Red-eyed Vireos do not show the same degree of territory instability as that seen in Song Sparrows (Rice 1978a, b, pers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) discrimination between neighbors and strangers songs was not demonstrated when songs were broadcast just inside subjects' territorial boundaries (Kroodsma 1976, Searcy et al 1981, but was demonstrated when songs were broadcast from the neighbors' territories (Stoddard et al 1992). Song sparrows have a significant amount of boundary instability in their territories (Stoddard et al 1992) and, during a year of high density, one-half of the territory take-overs were shown to be carried out by neighbors (Arcese 1989). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be interpreted as rural birds perceiving the playback as a greater social challenge than did urban birds. This hypothesis could be tested by presenting birds from different habitats with social challenges of varying intensity such as familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics (Stoddard et al, 1990).…”
Section: Habitat Differences In Neural Response To Conspecific Songmentioning
confidence: 99%