[1993] Proceedings Eighth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
DOI: 10.1109/lics.1993.287602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong normalization for second order classical natural deduction

Abstract: In this paper we prove the strong normalization theorem for second order classical natural deduction. The method used is an adaptation of the one of reducibility candidates introduced in [3] for second order intuitionistic natural deduction. The extension to the classical case requires in particular a simplification of the notion of reducibility candidate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. As shown in the next section, the λ nC -tp calculus corresponds to Parigot's call-by-name λµ calculus, which is confluent and strongly normalizable (Py, 1998;Parigot, 1993b;Parigot, 1997). The λ vC -tp calculus corresponds to a subset of the λµ v calculus of Ong and Stewart (1997) which is strongly normalizing.…”
Section: Reduction Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. As shown in the next section, the λ nC -tp calculus corresponds to Parigot's call-by-name λµ calculus, which is confluent and strongly normalizable (Py, 1998;Parigot, 1993b;Parigot, 1997). The λ vC -tp calculus corresponds to a subset of the λµ v calculus of Ong and Stewart (1997) which is strongly normalizing.…”
Section: Reduction Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…⊥ e is considered at the same level as Passivate). Parigot's normalization proof for minimal classical natural deduction (Parigot, 1993b;Parigot, 1997) applies also for full classical natural deduction. THEOREM 14 (Parigot).…”
Section: Minimal Classical Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We say that Red is a reducibility family if X ⊆ A for all A ∈ Red . There are essentially three kinds of reducibility families: Tait's saturated sets [17], Girard's reducibility candidates [7] and biorthogonals [13]. In this paper we focus on the last two.…”
Section: Example 21 ([18]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] and [20]) The F D2 type system has the following properties : 1) Type is preserved during reduction. 2) Typable λµ-terms are strongly normalizable.…”
Section: Pure and Typed λµ-Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%