Strong Shaking Predicted in Tokyo From an Expected M7+ Itoigawa‐Shizuoka Earthquake

Abstract

The Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line (ISTL) is a major oblique left-lateral crustal fault that is expected to host M7+ events in the near future. Its proximity to the Kanto sedimentary basin poses a threat to the population of Metropolitan Tokyo. This study constructs ground motion predictions for scenario earthquakes on the ISTL using virtual earthquakes. We use the ambient seismic field to calculate the cross-correlation function that we assume proportional to the elastodynamic Green tensor between High-Sensitivity Seismograph network stations, which act as sources located above the ISTL, and the stations of the dense Metropolitan Seismic Observation network, which act as receivers in the Kanto Basin. We use the virtual earthquake approach , https://doi.org/10.1029Denolle, Dunham, et al., 2014, https://doi.org/10.1126 to predict ground motion from a suite of 270 kinematic sources and find that predicted ground motions are strong enough that nonlinear effects, which we do not model, may become important. We find that the shape of the sedimentary basin substantially alters the shaking by amplifying long-period ground motions as seismic waves refract at the basin edge. Additionally, we quantify ground motion variability due to source uncertainty, surmise that ground motions are lognormally distributed with regard to source uncertainties, and suggest that the variability is affected (locally either enhanced or reduced) by the basin shape. Finally, we find a coupling point between source and wave paths for epicentral locations on the ISTL that generates almost twice the shaking as equivalent unilateral ruptures, despite directivity orientation that would favor southward ruptures. Plain Language SummaryThe Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line (ISTL) is a major crustal fault that is expected to host M7+ events in the future. Its proximity to the Kanto sedimentary basin poses a threat to the population of Metropolitan Tokyo. This study constructs ground motion predictions for scenario earthquakes on the ISTL using continuous recordings of the ambient seismic field. It takes advantage of dense seismic networks in Japan (High-Sensitivity Seismograph network and Metropolitan Seismic Observation network) to characterize seismic wave propagation in complex sedimentary basin structures. The results show that the sedimentary basin shape particularly affects the strength of the ground shaking and its variability. Overall, ground motion levels for a future ISTL earthquake are large and likely to affect tall infrastructures such as tall buildings and bridges. exhibit strong excitation of the first overtone mode at the basin edge. We elaborate on the source models and waveform synthetics constructed in laterally homogeneous medium to offer a discussion between ground motions from a simple and from a realistic 3-D medium. Calibration of the relative VEA amplitudes to absolute levels is performed using the Nagano earthquake. Finally, we examine and interpret our results for larger scenario earthquakes for both waveform predictions from t...

Monitoring the 2021 Mw 8.2 Alaska Earthquake by an Offshore Seismic and Fluid Pressure Observation Network and Implications for Ocean‐Crust Dynamic Coupling

“…A sedimentary layer of low seismic velocity is known to cause amplification of surface wave amplitudes (e.g., Bowden & Tsai, 2017; Drake, 1980; Joyner, 2000). Studying wave amplification as seismic energy being trapped in low‐velocity sedimentary basins (the so‐called “basin effect”) near urban areas is critical for assessing seismic hazards associated with the amplified ground shaking (e.g., Denolle et al., 2018). Most earlier studies of surface‐wave amplification were focused on continental sedimentary basins (e.g., Borcherdt & Gibbs, 1976; Denolle et al., 2014; Kawase & Aki, 1989; Olsen & Schuster, 1995).…”

Pronounced Seismic Anisotropy in Kanto Sedimentary Basin: A Case Study of Using Dense Arrays, Ambient Noise Seismology, and Multi‐Modal Surface‐Wave Imaging

“…The advantage of using ambient‐noise correlations to image sedimentary basins is that signals tend to be strong at the resonance frequencies of the sedimentary basins (3–7 s) that only large local earthquakes would excite (Day et al., 2012; Denolle, Dunham, et al., 2014; Denolle et al., 2018; Olsen, 2000; Olsen et al., 2009; Viens et al., 2016; Wirth et al., 2019). However, characterizing a sedimentary basin simply by a resonance period does not capture the significant complexity of wavefield propagation in sedimentary basins.…”

“…The popularity of this technique has made it a standard tool to image the structure at a broad range of length scales, from local (Chmiel et al., 2019; Nakata et al., 2015), regional (Berg et al., 2018; Bowden et al., 2017; Brenguier et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2008; Porritt et al., 2011; Sabra et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2012; Yao & Van Der Hilst, 2009; Yao et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2018; Ward et al., 2013), continental (Ekström et al., 2009; Saygin & Kennett, 2010, 2012; Shen & Ritzwoller, 2016; Shen et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2016), and global scales (Haned et al., 2015; Nishida et al., 2009). Some studies have also used the ambient field to either directly predict ground motions in basin (Denolle, Dunham, et al., 2014; Denolle et al., 2018; Prieto & Beroza, 2008; Viens et al., 2016) or to predict amplification effects (Bowden et al., 2015; Pilz et al., 2009; Prieto et al., 2011).…”

Optimal Stacking of Noise Cross-Correlation Functions

“…Cross-correlations of ambient seismic noise have been widely used to image the Earth's elastic (L. Feng and Ritzwoller 2019;Shapiro et al 2005; S.-M. Wu et al 2021;X. Yang andGao 2018, 2020) and anelastic structure (Prieto et al 2009), model ground motions (Marine A Denolle et al 2013Denolle et al , 2014Denolle et al , 2018Kwak et al 2017;Viens and Marine A Denolle 2019;Viens et al 2017), and monitor transient velocity changes in the shallow subsurface (F. Clements and Marine A Denolle 2018;Donaldson et al 2019;K.-F. Feng et al 2021;Olivier et al 2019; Q.-Y. Wang et al 2017;Z.…”