2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c07963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strong–Weak Response Network-Enabled Ionic Conductive Hydrogels with High Stretchability, Self-Healability, and Self-Adhesion for Ionic Sensors

Abstract: The requirement of ionic conductive hydrogels with tailor-made superelasticity and high chain mobility is highly desired while meeting a challenge. Herein, ionic conductive hydrogels with the design of strong–weak response networks were synthesized via the free-radical copolymerization of monomers of 1-methyl-3-(4-vinylbenzyl)­imidazolium chloride and sodium 2-acrylamino-2-methylpropanesulfonate in water. The as-formed strong–weak response networks in ionic conductive hydrogels included binary interactions of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure a and b, within the small (5–15%) and large (100–500%) strain ranges, the organohydrogel sensor could achieve the repeated relative resistance variation values (Δ R / R 0 ) at the same tensile strain and then return to the pristine values after releasing. Meanwhile, the assembled sensor exhibited a satisfactory sensitivity to strain stimuli, and the maximum gauge factor (GF) value could reach 1.8 (Figure c), which was comparable to the gel polymer-based strain sensors reported recently. In Figure S7, it can be seen that the relative resistance changes were able to synchronize with strains. Meanwhile, the response time and recovery time of the organohydrogel sensor at the 15% strain were explored by the quick loading–unloading process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As shown in Figure a and b, within the small (5–15%) and large (100–500%) strain ranges, the organohydrogel sensor could achieve the repeated relative resistance variation values (Δ R / R 0 ) at the same tensile strain and then return to the pristine values after releasing. Meanwhile, the assembled sensor exhibited a satisfactory sensitivity to strain stimuli, and the maximum gauge factor (GF) value could reach 1.8 (Figure c), which was comparable to the gel polymer-based strain sensors reported recently. In Figure S7, it can be seen that the relative resistance changes were able to synchronize with strains. Meanwhile, the response time and recovery time of the organohydrogel sensor at the 15% strain were explored by the quick loading–unloading process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The GF values of the sensor in the strain ranges of 0–100% and 100–200% were 1.6 and 3.7, respectively. Compared with other hydrogels in Table S1, the P­(MArg-FHVI-AA) hydrogel had ultra-stretchability and adhesive strength. ,,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Compared with other hydrogels in Table S1, the P(MArg-FHVI-AA) hydrogel had ultra-stretchability and adhesive strength. 6,30,31,55,56 ■…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The healing PCRs exhibited Young’s modulus values in the range of 2.4–3.5 GPa, generally remaining consistent with the predamaged samples. The self-healing ability could be ascribed to the cooperative effects of hydrogen bonding and accelerated diffusion of the polymeric chains in the polymer at high temperatures . Although mechanical degradation was observed after the self-healing process, the parts from DES-based PCRs retained more than 50% of their original ultimate tensile strength (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The self-healing ability could be ascribed to the cooperative effects of hydrogen bonding and accelerated diffusion of the polymeric chains in the polymer at high temperatures. 43 Although mechanical degradation was observed after the self-healing process, the parts from DES-based PCRs retained more than 50% of their original ultimate tensile strength (Figure 3b). Among various printed constructs, PCR-1/4/1 exhibited the highest healing efficiency of 75.9%, which was slightly lower than those of previously reported soft hydrogels and elastomers.…”
Section: Mechanical and Thermalmentioning
confidence: 99%