2023
DOI: 10.1017/etds.2023.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strongly aperiodic SFTs on generalized Baumslag–Solitar groups

Abstract: We look at constructions of aperiodic subshifts of finite type (SFTs) on fundamental groups of graph of groups. In particular, we prove that all generalized Baumslag-Solitar groups (GBS) admit a strongly aperiodic SFT. Our proof is based on a structural theorem by Whyte and on two constructions of strongly aperiodic SFTs on $\mathbb {F}_n\times \mathbb {Z}$ and $BS(m,n)$ of our own. Our two constructions rely on a path-folding technique that lifts an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Groups that are known to admit a strongly aperiodic SFT are Z 2 [21] and Z d for d > 2 [10], fundamental groups of oriented surfaces [8], hyperbolic groups [9], discrete Heisenberg group [22] and more generally groups that can be written as a semi-direct product G = Z 2 ⋊ φ H , provided G has decidable word problem [7], and amenable Baumslag-Solitar groups [11]. In [3] the authors adapt the construction of [4,5] to get a strongly aperiodic SFT on non-amenable Baumslag-Solitar groups BS(m, n). None of these two constructions are, to the best of our knowledge, minimal SFTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Groups that are known to admit a strongly aperiodic SFT are Z 2 [21] and Z d for d > 2 [10], fundamental groups of oriented surfaces [8], hyperbolic groups [9], discrete Heisenberg group [22] and more generally groups that can be written as a semi-direct product G = Z 2 ⋊ φ H , provided G has decidable word problem [7], and amenable Baumslag-Solitar groups [11]. In [3] the authors adapt the construction of [4,5] to get a strongly aperiodic SFT on non-amenable Baumslag-Solitar groups BS(m, n). None of these two constructions are, to the best of our knowledge, minimal SFTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14] the author adapts [17] to an expansive setting, the trinary tiling, akin to BS (1,3). Later in [4,5] the example of aperiodic SFT that is given is a construction adapted from [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%