1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.r7041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strongly correlated electron systems: Photoemission and the single-impurity model

Abstract: We present high-resolution, angle-resolved photoemission spectra for Ce-based and U-based strongly correlated electron systems. The experimental results are irreconcilable with the long-accepted single-impurity model, which predicts a narrow singlet state, in close proximity to the Fermi energy, whose linewidth and binding energy are a constant determined by a characteristic temperature T K for the material. We report that both 4 f and 5 f photoemission features disperse with crystal momentum at temperatures b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, in this correlated and multi-electronic picture, semi-isolated 4f states (at a nominal binding energy of 1 eV) are in contact with the bath of spd valence electrons, generating spectral features at the Fermi Level and at a binding energy corresponding to the depth of the bath electron well, about 2 eV below the Fermi Level in the case of Ce. This controversy has spilled over into issues such as the volume collapse associated with the alpha to gamma phase transition [17][18][19] and the electronic structure of Ce compounds [20][21][22][23]. (A more generalized schematic illustrating the competition between the bandwidth (W) and correlation strength (U) is shown in Figure 1.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, in this correlated and multi-electronic picture, semi-isolated 4f states (at a nominal binding energy of 1 eV) are in contact with the bath of spd valence electrons, generating spectral features at the Fermi Level and at a binding energy corresponding to the depth of the bath electron well, about 2 eV below the Fermi Level in the case of Ce. This controversy has spilled over into issues such as the volume collapse associated with the alpha to gamma phase transition [17][18][19] and the electronic structure of Ce compounds [20][21][22][23]. (A more generalized schematic illustrating the competition between the bandwidth (W) and correlation strength (U) is shown in Figure 1.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of PAM, BE and intensity variations of these features as a function of electron wave vector k are expected being particularly strong for the Fermi-level peak. In fact, in a few cases energy dispersions [6,7,8,9,10,11] and k-dependent intensity variations [6,10,12] were reported and qualitatively interpreted in the light of PAM. A quantitative description of the phenomena in relation to the VB structure however is still lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One sees again in this view of heavy mass The key features in Fig. 3 for a dispersing formation the tendency that the basic FS topology is conduction band include: (i) the renormalization of determined by the conduction band E -crossings in f-''bands'' by ARPES, and has been used in arguadjustable parameters, but in a full microscopic ments for the (complete) failure of the single impuritreatment they are linked to the original Hamiltonian ty model [17,18]. We see here that the success of the parameters through Kondo-like relations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…URu Si is a nominally 5f F 2 2 [15,16] and claims of ''band-like'' dispersion of system with a moderately large linear specific heat 2 f-states [17,18]. However, because of technical barcoefficient of g 5180 mJ / mol-K extrapolated from riers, ARPES has never provided enough FS detail in the paramagnetic phase [24,25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%