2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-014-0614-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strongly elliptic pseudodifferential equations on the sphere with radial basis functions

Abstract: Spherical radial basis functions are used to define approximate solutions to strongly elliptic pseudodifferential equations on the unit sphere. These equations arise from geodesy. The approximate solutions are found by the Galerkin and collocation methods. A salient feature of the paper is a unified theory for error analysis of both approximation methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Theorem 1 will be given in Section 4. Note that convergence in H 2κ+r (M) as h A → 0 follows from (47) only when 0 ≤ r < s − 2κ − d, thus under a stricter assumption than (43), s > 2κ + d, and the discrete convergence follows from (48) under the assumption that s > max{2κ, d 2 + 1} + d.…”
Section: Note That Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proof of Theorem 1 will be given in Section 4. Note that convergence in H 2κ+r (M) as h A → 0 follows from (47) only when 0 ≤ r < s − 2κ − d, thus under a stricter assumption than (43), s > 2κ + d, and the discrete convergence follows from (48) under the assumption that s > max{2κ, d 2 + 1} + d.…”
Section: Note That Maxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meshless numerical methods are particularly attractive for solving operator equations on manifolds, in particular on the sphere [22,23], because of the difficulties of creating and maintaining suitable meshes or grids in this setting. Error bounds for meshless methods for the approximation of functions and specifically solutions of operator equations on manifolds have been studied for example in [24,26,27,32,33,35,36,37,43]. However, these results do not apply to localized finite difference type methods considered below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spherical radial basis functions appear to be more suitable for solving problems with scattered data, see e.g. [29,32,37,42] and references therein. However, the resulting matrix system from this approximation is very ill-conditioned.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communicated by: Tobin Driscoll Meshless numerical methods are particularly attractive for solving operator equations on manifolds, in particular on the sphere [32,33], because of the difficulties of creating and maintaining suitable meshes or grids in this setting. Error bounds for meshless methods for the approximation of functions and specifically solutions of operator equations on manifolds have been studied for example in [12,14,34,36,37,42,43,[45][46][47]53]. However, these results do not apply to localized finite difference type methods considered below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%