1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80343-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Adaptations in the Specialized Bacteriophage T4 Co-Chaperonin Gp31 Expand the Size of the Anfinsen Cage

Abstract: The Gp31 protein from bacteriophage T4 functionally substitutes for the bacterial co-chaperonin GroES in assisted protein folding reactions both in vitro and in vivo. But Gp31 is required for the folding and/or assembly of the T4 major capsid protein Gp23, and this requirement cannot be satisfied by GroES. The 2.3 A crystal structure of Gp31 shows that its tertiary and quaternary structures are similar to those of GroES despite the existence of only 14% sequence identity between the two proteins. However, Gp31… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because T4 cannot propagate in the absence of Gp31, GroES cannot substitute for Gp31 (21). From its crystal structure, the roof structure of Gp31 was found to be completely absent, leaving a cavity of at least 16 Å in diameter (26). Due to the absence of the roof structure of Gp31, the complexes between GroEL and Gp31 might have a larger substrate-binding cavity than GroEL and GroES.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because T4 cannot propagate in the absence of Gp31, GroES cannot substitute for Gp31 (21). From its crystal structure, the roof structure of Gp31 was found to be completely absent, leaving a cavity of at least 16 Å in diameter (26). Due to the absence of the roof structure of Gp31, the complexes between GroEL and Gp31 might have a larger substrate-binding cavity than GroEL and GroES.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with GroES, the gp31 monomer has a 12-residue insertion starting at position 82, a longer mobile loop (22 vs. 16 aa), no roof ␤-hairpin, and no tyrosine at position 71, a residue that is present in all GroES-like cochaperonins and protrudes into the GroEL-GroES folding cavity. These differences, either by themselves or in combination, have been postulated to lead to a slight expansion of the GroEL-gp31 folding cage relative to the GroEL-GroES cavity (22). Preliminary cryo-electron microscopic images of the GroEL(ADP)-gp31 complex show that gp31 protrudes less far into the cavity than GroES when compared with the GroEL(ADP)-GroES crystal structure (D. K. Clare, P.J.B., H.H., S.M.V., and H. R. Saibil, unpublished results), suggestive of a larger folding cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although T4 bacteriophage utilizes the host chaperonin, it encodes its own version of cochaperonin, known as gp31. The recent crystal structure of gp31 (78) suggests that it can form a larger folding cavity in the cis complex (Anfinsen cage) to accommodate the >50 kDa phage head protein (gp23), which may not fit comfortably under GroES.…”
Section: The Asymmetrical Groel-groes-adp Complex Structurementioning
confidence: 99%