2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural analysis of macromolecular levan produced by Bacillus megaterium GJT321 based on enzymatic method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A broad band at 1642.41 cm -1 was due to the bound water [54]. C-O-H stretching vibration appears at 1123.31 cm -1 , and the strong broad peak at 1011.77 cm −1 was characterized by glycosidic linkage (C-O-C) stretching vibration in pyranose or furanose which is the carbohydrate fingerprint [55,56]. The broad peak at 924.03 and 807.27 cm -1 is confirmed as the furanose of the sugar units [57].…”
Section: Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Ftir)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A broad band at 1642.41 cm -1 was due to the bound water [54]. C-O-H stretching vibration appears at 1123.31 cm -1 , and the strong broad peak at 1011.77 cm −1 was characterized by glycosidic linkage (C-O-C) stretching vibration in pyranose or furanose which is the carbohydrate fingerprint [55,56]. The broad peak at 924.03 and 807.27 cm -1 is confirmed as the furanose of the sugar units [57].…”
Section: Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy (Ftir)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide and strong peak at 3304 cm − 1 was caused by the stretching vibration of O-H (Moussa et al 2017;Zhang et al 2014), indicating the existence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding. The weak peaks at 2931 cm − 1 and 2887 cm − 1 were the results of C-H stretching vibration and bending vibration respectively (Yu et al 2016). The strong absorption peak at 1644 cm − 1 was caused by the O-H bending vibration, which might be caused by the presence of water in the sample (Hao et al 2016).…”
Section: Ft-ir Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…9B), seven major proton signals were observed at 4.10 ppm (H3), 4.01 ppm (H4), 3.87 ppm (H5), 3.82 ppm (H6a), 3.68 ppm (H1a), 3.60 ppm (H1b), and 3.48 ppm (H6b), respectively. All of them were in the ring proton region (3.4-4.2 ppm) indicating that the polysaccharide was composed of ketose (Cai et al 2019;Yu et al 2016). The ratio of peak areas was approximately 1:1:1:1:1:1:1 which meant the same amount of every kind of H atom.…”
Section: Nmr Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The sample was mixed with KBr (#8966 KBR PREM SPCTROGRD FTIR PWD, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a ratio of about 1:100, ground thoroughly and then pressed into a 1 mm pellet. The pellet was scanned 32 times in the absorbance mode from 4000 to 400 cm −1 with a 4 cm −1 resolution 6,22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MWs of the purified levan (redissolved with deionized water to 1 mg mL –1 ) were determined with a gel permeation chromatography (GPC) system, 3,22 which employed a Bio‐Sep 6FF Sepharose CL gel filtration column eluted with 0.7% (wt/vol) Na 2 SO 4 at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min –1 . The sugar contained in the elution fractions was determined by the phenol–sulfuric acid method 24 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%