2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural analysis of nanostructured iron antimonate by experimental and quantum chemical simulation and its LPG sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have removed the above drawback of the sensor and fabricated nano-cube/cuboid-based LPG sensors with a short response time as compared to previous sensors reported in literature. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]40,59,61,64 As discussed in introduction section, the maximum sensitivity of room-temperature LPG sensors reported in literature is 0.77 for 600 ppm of LPG, as investigated by Goutham et al 53 However, the sensor we developed has a sensitivity of 1.36 for 1000 ppm of LPG, which is quite high in comparison to previous sensors reported below the lower explosive limit (LEL) of LPG. Moreover, the response and recovery times of our sensor are $41 and 95 s, respectively, which are less than those observed by Saxena et al 58 Therefore, in fact, our study is an advanced step towards the development of an efficient sensor for LPG detection.…”
Section: Lpg Sensing Performance Of the Znsb 2 O 6 Lm Sensormentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have removed the above drawback of the sensor and fabricated nano-cube/cuboid-based LPG sensors with a short response time as compared to previous sensors reported in literature. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]40,59,61,64 As discussed in introduction section, the maximum sensitivity of room-temperature LPG sensors reported in literature is 0.77 for 600 ppm of LPG, as investigated by Goutham et al 53 However, the sensor we developed has a sensitivity of 1.36 for 1000 ppm of LPG, which is quite high in comparison to previous sensors reported below the lower explosive limit (LEL) of LPG. Moreover, the response and recovery times of our sensor are $41 and 95 s, respectively, which are less than those observed by Saxena et al 58 Therefore, in fact, our study is an advanced step towards the development of an efficient sensor for LPG detection.…”
Section: Lpg Sensing Performance Of the Znsb 2 O 6 Lm Sensormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…LPG sensors based on nanospheres, nanorods, nano-owers, nanoellipses, nanonails, and vertical and horizontal rods have already been investigated, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]40,59,61,64 but their sensing behaviours were found cumbersome to use due to their large response time. We have removed the above drawback of the sensor and fabricated nano-cube/cuboid-based LPG sensors with a short response time as compared to previous sensors reported in literature.…”
Section: Lpg Sensing Performance Of the Znsb 2 O 6 Lm Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many reports are available on the development of the LPG sensors that operate at room temperature, the reduction of the MOS size [6,7], and the mixing of MOS with metal nanoparticles [8] including the fabrication of heterojunctions [4,[9][10][11], which is one of the most strategies used. Due to the mixing of MOS and other materials, it formed a variety of the unique properties for sensing material, such as a change in conductance, improved surface catalytic property, increasing surface reaction sites, and producing a high porosity [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%