1997
DOI: 10.2307/991244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Analysis, Structural Insights, and Historical Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, the standard tool used by engineers for the analysis of structures is FEA software. As many other researchers, the author is convinced of the interest to use limit analysis for the analysis of masonry structures (for reasons very clearly exposed by Mainstone (Mainstone 1997) and Heyman in various occasions). The program of limit analysis is not looking for stress distributions but only for ultimate conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nowadays, the standard tool used by engineers for the analysis of structures is FEA software. As many other researchers, the author is convinced of the interest to use limit analysis for the analysis of masonry structures (for reasons very clearly exposed by Mainstone (Mainstone 1997) and Heyman in various occasions). The program of limit analysis is not looking for stress distributions but only for ultimate conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A scaling ratio of, shall we say, 1 to 100 is quite a challenge. A second general difficulty, to which Dr Mainstone has drawn attention, 12 is that a photo-elastic model is in no way capable of allowing for the stresses and deformations developed during the construction process.…”
Section: Photo-elastic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One uses data collected by others, relying on their attention, precision, and thoroughness. Mainstone's invective against the application of structural analysis to buildings which are no longer extant [12] makes several points that are of value. The author agrees with Mainstone that engineering analysis alone is of little value, and that engineering analysis should always be understood within the historic context that considers the materials, techniques, and understanding of the time.…”
Section: Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%