“…Compared with an almost 1:1 ratio of edge-on and face-on orientations for gNR-CF , the films cast from FAs show crystallites with a very high ratio of edge-on orientations, 94.8, 86.3, and 84.2% for gNR-6FOH , gNR-3FOH , and gNR-9FOH , respectively. Therefore, the predominance of edge-on orientation and tighter molecular packing for FA cast films are conducive to the effective charge transport in the parallel direction of the device architecture. , To gain insight into the crystallinity difference of gNR in thin films, coherence lengths (CLs) and paracrystalline disorder ( g ) were calculated from the width of the π–π stacking diffraction peaks (CL = 2π K /FWHM, K = 0.9, ). , As shown in Figure S16c, the gNR thin films formed with FAs displayed further enhanced crystalline packing: the CL values of the (010) peaks along the IP direction increased from 47.9 Å for CF to 59.5 Å for 3FOH, 71.5 Å for 6FOH, and 54.9 Å for 9FOH. Meanwhile, the CLs of the emerging (020) peak were also calculated to be 60.8 Å for 3FOH, 93.0 Å for 6FOH, and 59.4 Å for 9FOH; the largest CLs of the films in both (010) and (020) peaks endow gNR-6FOH the highest electron mobility. ,, In addition, the lower paracrystalline disorder of π–π stacking for FA cast films (Figure S16d) also suggests the further structural ordering, which leads to a reduction of the number of structural trapping sites for the electron carriers and indicates a strong correlation with charge transport properties. , It is worth noting that the combination of edge orientation predominance, closer molecular stacking, and enhanced crystallinity always leads to a more effective electronic transport; i.e., gNR-6FOH possesses the highest 1.78 × 10 –2 cm 2 V –1 s –1 compared to 1.25 × 10 –2 cm 2 V –1 s –1 for gNR-CF , owing to its highest edge-on orientation ratio, closest distance and maximum coherence length, and lowest paracrystalline disorder for (020) π–π stacking .…”