The influence of a number of redox reagents on the charge state distribution in nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry was examined using cytochrome c and ubiquitin. The redox active species investigated were: 1,4-benzoquinone, quinhydrone, tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ), hydroquinone, and ascorbic acid. The redox active species was mixed with the protein sample before injection into the nanoelectrospray emitter, and mass spectra were acquired using a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Under the same experimental conditions, the charge state distribution of cytochrome c was observed to shift from a weighted average charge state of 14.25 (in the absence of redox species) to 7.10 in the presence of 1,4-benzoquinone. When quinhydrone was mixed with cytochrome c, the charge state distribution of the protein also shifted to lower charge states (weighted average charge state ϭ 9.43), indicative of less charge state reduction for quinhydrone than with 1,4-benzoquinone. Addition of the redox reagent had little effect on the conformation of cytochrome c, as indicated by far ultraviolet circular dichroism spectra. In contrast, the reagents TCNQ, hydroquinone, and ascorbic acid exhibited negligible effects on the observed charge state distribution of the protein. The differing results for these redox reagents can be rationalized in terms of the redox half reactions involving these species. The results observed with ubiquitin upon adding quinhydrone were analogous to those observed with cytochrome c. The multiple charging phenomenon, however, also increases the complexity of the mass spectra, and may concomitantly decrease dynamic range, reduce sensitivity, and compromise mixture component analysis [4,5]. Mass spectral deconvolution procedures are frequently useful in reducing spectral complexity [6], but are decreasingly effective as the mixture complexity increases.The charge state distributions of macromolecules can be influenced by many factors, such as the analyte structure/conformation [7][8][9][10][11] [18,20,34,35]. Many of these factors are interrelated. For example, changes in the solution pH, solvent, and heating conditions can alter the conformation of a protein, thereby affecting the observed charge state distribution. Three strategies have been reported in the literature in an effort to manipulate and simplify the observed multiple charge state distributions. One condensed-phase strategy takes place by modifying the solution conditions such as pH [36]. A second condensed-phase strategy invoked to control the observed charge state distribution in ESI is to admix base molecules with different gas-phase basicities into the analyte mixture [37]. The other strategy takes place in the gas-phase; this has been achieved either by utilizing a post ion/ion reaction within an ion-trap spectrometer to reduce multiple charge states [19, 38 -42], or by utilizing a "neutralization chamber" before the mass analyzer, to reduce multiple charge states [43][44][45][46][47]. These gas-phase approaches have demonstrated great effec...