1990
DOI: 10.1016/0920-9964(90)90079-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional characteristics of the corpus callosum in schzophrenics, psychiatric controls, and normal controls: An MRI and neuropsychological evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have reported that schizophrenic males have different morphological and physiological brain abnormalities, in addition to a lower family risk, than schizophrenic females. 9–20 Seeman and Lang hypothesized that estrogens account for many of the observed gender differences. 21 They noted that estrogens increase the density of dopamine type 2 receptors as do neuroleptics, and high levels of estrogens may serve a protective function in the onset of schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have reported that schizophrenic males have different morphological and physiological brain abnormalities, in addition to a lower family risk, than schizophrenic females. 9–20 Seeman and Lang hypothesized that estrogens account for many of the observed gender differences. 21 They noted that estrogens increase the density of dopamine type 2 receptors as do neuroleptics, and high levels of estrogens may serve a protective function in the onset of schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) In an MRI study, Nasrallah et al (1990) found a reduction in brain volume in 20 patients with schizophrenia by comparison with normal control subjects that was greater in females than in males, with a significant diagnosis × sex interaction. (3) In an MRI study, Raine et al (1990) found the corpus callosum to be thicker in females than in males—the findings being the reverse of those in normal subjects.…”
Section: Sex × Diagnosis Interactions and Their Possible Significancementioning
confidence: 96%