2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01556-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Functional Characterization of the Immunoproteasome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 82 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, proteasome inhibitors are commonly classified by their characteristic "warhead" in seven classes (see Figure 1.9): aldehydes, boronic acids, α,β-epoxyketones, α-ketoaldehydes (glyoxals), vinyl sulfones, vinyl amides (syrbactins), and β-lactones. 178 Aldehydes (MG-132) have great value as research tools, but no medical potential due to their off-target activity towards serine and cysteine proteases. 158,174,179,180 Boronic acids are among the most potent inhibitors despite their high reactivity and associated side effects, bortezomib (PS-341) was synthesized with MG-132 as a lead compound and was the first approved proteasome inhibitor by the FDA.…”
Section: S Proteasome Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, proteasome inhibitors are commonly classified by their characteristic "warhead" in seven classes (see Figure 1.9): aldehydes, boronic acids, α,β-epoxyketones, α-ketoaldehydes (glyoxals), vinyl sulfones, vinyl amides (syrbactins), and β-lactones. 178 Aldehydes (MG-132) have great value as research tools, but no medical potential due to their off-target activity towards serine and cysteine proteases. 158,174,179,180 Boronic acids are among the most potent inhibitors despite their high reactivity and associated side effects, bortezomib (PS-341) was synthesized with MG-132 as a lead compound and was the first approved proteasome inhibitor by the FDA.…”
Section: S Proteasome Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%