2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00444-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Functional Evidence for Ligand-Independent Transcriptional Activation by the Estrogen-Related Receptor 3

Abstract: The crystal structure of the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the estrogen-related receptor 3 (ERR3) complexed with a steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) peptide reveals a transcriptionally active conformation in absence of any ligand. The structure explains why estradiol does not bind ERRs with significant affinity. Docking of the previously reported ERR antagonists, diethylstilbestrol and 4-hydroxytamoxifen, requires structural rearrangements enlarging the ligand binding pocket that can only be accommodated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
250
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
250
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because these receptors have very small ligand biding pockets, endogenous ligand discovery remains unlikely, although synthetic ligands have been developed and ERRα is blocked by diethylstilbestrol, while ERRβ and γ are blocked by tamoxifen (Coward et al 2001;Greschik et al 2002;Willy et al 2004). The activity of ERRs appears to be constitutive, with the ligand binding pocket stably arranged in an active conformation without ligand (Xie et al 1999;Greschik et al 2002;Greschik et al 2004). Because ERRα is widely expressed in adult tissues, especially in tissues that utilize or can utilize fatty acid β-oxidation, many studies have addressed its role in cellular energetics (Luo et al 2003).…”
Section: Errsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these receptors have very small ligand biding pockets, endogenous ligand discovery remains unlikely, although synthetic ligands have been developed and ERRα is blocked by diethylstilbestrol, while ERRβ and γ are blocked by tamoxifen (Coward et al 2001;Greschik et al 2002;Willy et al 2004). The activity of ERRs appears to be constitutive, with the ligand binding pocket stably arranged in an active conformation without ligand (Xie et al 1999;Greschik et al 2002;Greschik et al 2004). Because ERRα is widely expressed in adult tissues, especially in tissues that utilize or can utilize fatty acid β-oxidation, many studies have addressed its role in cellular energetics (Luo et al 2003).…”
Section: Errsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both vertebrate ERRs and invertebrate ERs are constitutively active and do not bind estradiol. The crystal structures of human ERRs [11][12][13][14] and a 3D model of octopus ER [33] indicates that their ligand-binding domains are too small to accommodate estradiol.…”
Section: Figure 1 Phylogenetic Analysis Of Invertebrate and Vertebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation for the absence of steroid binding by ERRs came from analysis of the crystal structures of human ERRα [11,12] and ERRγ [13], which showed that the ligand binding site is too small to accommodate a steroid [11][12][13][14]. Unlike the ER, the ERR does not require a ligand to become transcriptionally active.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their significant homology with ERs in the ligand binding domain (LBD), ERRs do not (or only very weakly) respond to estradiol (E2) (2,12). Furthermore, whereas ERs are ligand-activated receptors, ERRs are constitutively active (13)(14)(15)(16), and a structural study confirmed that the ERR␥ LBD can adopt a transcriptionally active conformation and interact with the steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1) in the absence of any ligand (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%