2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional insights into Spns2-mediated transport of sphingosine-1-phosphate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, our analysis of SPNS2 binding to substrates S1P and FTY720-P provides new insights into the transporter's action on those molecules. In our simulations, we did not observe S1P or FTY720-P binding between TM5 and TM8, as was modeled previously for S1P 28 . It remains unclear if the previously modeled S1P location is an intermediate step of the reaction cycle, an artifact of the substrate interacting with the saposin nanodisc, or a modeling error due to poor local resolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, our analysis of SPNS2 binding to substrates S1P and FTY720-P provides new insights into the transporter's action on those molecules. In our simulations, we did not observe S1P or FTY720-P binding between TM5 and TM8, as was modeled previously for S1P 28 . It remains unclear if the previously modeled S1P location is an intermediate step of the reaction cycle, an artifact of the substrate interacting with the saposin nanodisc, or a modeling error due to poor local resolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Several distantly related transporters from the larger major facilitator superfamily serve as prototypes for MFS lipid transport 21,22 , including the lysophospholipid importer MFSD2A [23][24][25][26] and the orphan transporter HnSPNS from Hyphomonas neptunium 27 . Recently, apo structures of human SPNS2 in an outwardfacing conformation (Co-apo), and inward-facing structures in complex with S1P (Ci-S1P) and the inhibitor 16d (Ci-16d), have shed light on the protein's transport and inhibition 28 . However, the mechanism of substrate entry to the binding site, and the outward-to-inward conformational change, remain ambiguous without an inwardfacing apo state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As evidenced in this and numerous other reports, the predictive value of results regarding drug action from genetic manipulation is limited. Further, our reliance on phenotypic assays for STB characterization precludes certainty regarding the target contacted by the inhibitors although recently reported cryoEM structures of human Spns2 [38][39][40][41] with SLF1081851 (16d) or SLB1122168 (33p) bound indicates that the proximal STB target is Spns2. A convenient explanation of Spns2 function has this exporter releasing S1P from lymph endothelial cells to lymph and therefore predicts that STB administration would suppress lymph S1P concentrations, flatten the lymph: lymph node S1P concentration gradients and thereby inhibit lymphocyte egress to efferent lymph.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to traditional antibody-based campaigns which may require multiple rounds of screening and take many months or years to discover a suitable binder, our strategy only required us to make between 15-20 constructs to find a suitable chimera (Figure Supplement 1a-c). There are now many other similar methods such as the fusion of the target protein with BRIL and binding of the anti-BRIL Fab 50 and fusions of maltose-binding protein and DARPin 51 . However, since our strategy directly incorporates fluorescent proteins, this enables FSEC based screening of constructs and monitoring fluorescence throughout purification 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%