2023
DOI: 10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and functional properties of foundation species (mussels vs. seaweeds) predict functional aspects of the associated communities

Nicole M. Cameron,
Ricardo A. Scrosati,
Nelson Valdivia
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that, through environmental filtering and influences on interspecific interactions, abiotic variation along rocky coastlines affects the relative abundance of primary space holders ( Menge & Branch, 2001 ; Sanford, 2014 ). However, depending on their structural and functional properties, foundation species create specific conditions within their stands that favour particular sets of associated species ( Cameron, Scrosati & Valdivia, 2024a ). In theory, then, the species assemblages living in stands of a particular foundation species might depend little on external factors as long as stands of that foundation species remain similar along coastlines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that, through environmental filtering and influences on interspecific interactions, abiotic variation along rocky coastlines affects the relative abundance of primary space holders ( Menge & Branch, 2001 ; Sanford, 2014 ). However, depending on their structural and functional properties, foundation species create specific conditions within their stands that favour particular sets of associated species ( Cameron, Scrosati & Valdivia, 2024a ). In theory, then, the species assemblages living in stands of a particular foundation species might depend little on external factors as long as stands of that foundation species remain similar along coastlines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%