2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and mutational studies suggest key residues to determine whether stomatin SPFH domains form dimers or trimers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we revealed the difference in the oligomerization state of stomatin orthologs as the core domain of mouse stomatin was reported to form a dimer [ 4 ]; however, PhSto CD is a trimer. The key residues of PH1511, 56–62 and 162–168, were suggested to determine whether SPFH domains form a dimer or trimer structure [ 5 ]. As an intact 3D structure of the PH1511 monomer was lacking, it was difficult to predict a higher‐order structure consisting of homo‐oligomers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we revealed the difference in the oligomerization state of stomatin orthologs as the core domain of mouse stomatin was reported to form a dimer [ 4 ]; however, PhSto CD is a trimer. The key residues of PH1511, 56–62 and 162–168, were suggested to determine whether SPFH domains form a dimer or trimer structure [ 5 ]. As an intact 3D structure of the PH1511 monomer was lacking, it was difficult to predict a higher‐order structure consisting of homo‐oligomers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%