2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10812-010-9385-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and optical properties of CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 heterostructures irradiated by high-energy electrons*

Abstract: Thin films of Cu(In, Ga)Se 2 (CIGS) with a Ga/(Ga + In) ratio of ~0.27 corresponding to the standard elemental composition for solar-energy transducers were grown on Mo-coated glass substrates by the Cu, In, Ga, and Se co-evaporation technique from different sources. Transmission (T), photoluminescence (PL), and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra at 4.2 K were used to analyze electronic properties in the asgrown and electron-irradiated CIGS films. The band-gap energy (E g ) of the CIGS films measured u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our estimations, the numerical value of the parameter j is ~4 meV. The energy j is commonly referred to as the energy of spatial fluctua tions of the crystal potential in heavily doped semi conductors, especially multicomponent ones, in which such fluctuations are due to high concentra tions of intrinsic structural defects [22][23][24]. It should be noted that the value of j = 4 meV determined for the CZTS films is much smaller than the value of j for the similar 1.3 eV PL band observed in CZTS single crys tals (~11 meV) [25] and CZTS polycrystalline powders (~15 meV) [19,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our estimations, the numerical value of the parameter j is ~4 meV. The energy j is commonly referred to as the energy of spatial fluctua tions of the crystal potential in heavily doped semi conductors, especially multicomponent ones, in which such fluctuations are due to high concentra tions of intrinsic structural defects [22][23][24]. It should be noted that the value of j = 4 meV determined for the CZTS films is much smaller than the value of j for the similar 1.3 eV PL band observed in CZTS single crys tals (~11 meV) [25] and CZTS polycrystalline powders (~15 meV) [19,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By analogy with what happens in Cu(InGa)Se 2 alloys, such a value of k is indicative of the possibility of radiative recombination via transitions in donor-acceptor pairs or by band-(deep level) optical transitions. We have found that, as the excitation power density is elevated from 0.11 to 1.5 W cm -2 , the PL band shifts to the high energy spectral region, to 1.151 eV; in the region of relatively low excitation levels (0.11-3 W cm -2 ), the energy shift of the ~1.151 eV band (E p ) under variation in the exci tation power density J can be described by the expo nential function J = , where j is the parameter corresponding to the energy shift with increasing excitation power by one order of magnitude [22,23]. According to our estimations, the numerical value of the parameter j is ~4 meV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments showed that the ratio of elements in the CIGS thin fi lms varied from Ga/(Ga + In) ~ 0.28 on the surface to ~0.58 near the glass substrate. It is noteworthy that heterogeneous distributions of In and Ga with a preferential increase of the Ga concentration near the glass substrate or a contact layer of Mo on glass were previously observed [7,[14][15][16]. This must be considered when analyzing the physical properties of CIGS solid solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Analysis of the fi lm composition by SAES showed that the average concentrations of the principal substituents Ga and In were also x = Ga/(Ga + In) ~ 0.45. Known data for E g as a function of x of CIGS solid solutions indicated that E g approximated by a parabolic function for x ~ 0.45 [10,20,23,24] was ~1.20-1.26 eV at room temperature; approximated by a linear function [10,15], ~1.32 eV. The difference of E g ~ 1.36 eV for CIGS solid solution fi lms grown in the present work and the expected E g ~ 1.20-1.26 eV for x ~ 0.45 that was approximated by a parabolic function was logically explained by the heterogeneous distribution of x along the fi lm thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Как известно, твердые растворы CIGSe являются прямозонными полупроводниками, обладающими высоким коэффициентом поглощения света α ∼ 10 5 см −1 , и поэтому светопоглощающие слои в СЭ формируются с толщиной ∼ 1−3 мкм [2,[4][5][6]. СЭ, созданные на основе твердых растворов CIGSe, обладают такими достоинствами, как незначительное падение мощности при повышении температуры, слабая чувствительность к затемнению [8], высокая радиационная стойкость [9][10][11]. Максимальный достигнутый коэффициент полезного действия (кпд) СЭ на основе твердых растворов CIGSe, сформированных на стеклянных подложках, составляет 22.6% [12].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified