2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and permeability sensitivity of cells to low intensity ultrasound: Infrared and fluorescence evidence in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the treatments did not show any significant dependence of the studied effects on the US wave duty cycle. These observations are consistent with the low US absorption at 1 MHz; on the contrary, thermal effects and duty cycle could affect cells and tissues exposed to higher frequencies, being the US attenuation coefficient proportional to the frequency 23 , 31 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, the treatments did not show any significant dependence of the studied effects on the US wave duty cycle. These observations are consistent with the low US absorption at 1 MHz; on the contrary, thermal effects and duty cycle could affect cells and tissues exposed to higher frequencies, being the US attenuation coefficient proportional to the frequency 23 , 31 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Focusing on air-filled elastomeric PVA-shelled MBs, we demonstrated here that such agents when dispersed in water medium are found to become strongly stable over time in terms of morphology and structure, as compared to lipid-shelled MBs (months vs. hours). The system showed a good echogenicity in a range of frequencies centred at around 10 MHz, complementary to that of MBs with a lipid shell and useful to minimise the biological risks related to high-resolution imaging [11,20,57,58]. This should facilitate their use as UCAs as well as in derivatisation protocols for drug delivery and theranostics [1,7,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19,20) Still, regarding the cellular percentage reduction in some groups, other authors corroborate with our findings, showing that the acoustic cavitation is intrinsically related to the TUS bioeffects and by generating numerous compressions and rarefaction can become unstable and trigger changes in the cellular size And membrane compliance, with even cellular implosions due to the increase of temperature and intracellular pressure, resulting in the decrease of viable cells irreversibly. (10,21,22) Already, specifically in in vitro fibroblasts, Oliveira et al, (7) reported that the statistical significance was only found in the group irradiated with ultrasound with analog dose (0.5 W/cm 2 ) and pulse rate of 10% (p=0.003). In this group, cell viability increased from 24 to 48 hours, and from 48 to 72 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) In this sense, several authors report the efficiency of low intensity ultrasound in the percentage increase of viable cells cultured in vitro, with acceleration of proliferation and, (7)(8)(9) with the continuous, relevant therapeutic effects both in vivo and in vitro. (1,10) Furthermore, in the continuous mode, effects on the expression of cartilage specific mRNA in chondrocyte culture, (11) hypertrophy of muscle fibers, (1) or with pulsed modulation in biosynthetic activity and expression of integrins (12) and stimulation of anti-inflammatory systems in synovial membrane cells. (13) It is worth mentioning that although the effects of ultrasound have already been well described, the ideal dose-effect relationship still needs to be better elucidated and delimited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%