2016
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/33/335102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and photoelectron spectroscopic studies of band alignment at the Cu2ZnSnS4/CdS heterojunction with slight Ni doping in Cu2ZnSnS4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is apparent CdS forms a large cliff-like CBO (Type II) at the heterojunction with CZTSSe whereas In 2 S 3 forms a modest spike-like CBO (Type I). The larger CBO relative to previous reports 22,25,39,40 can arise due to the error introduced by the low-resolution IPES measurements.…”
Section: A Band Alignment At Buffer/cztsse Interfacecontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…It is apparent CdS forms a large cliff-like CBO (Type II) at the heterojunction with CZTSSe whereas In 2 S 3 forms a modest spike-like CBO (Type I). The larger CBO relative to previous reports 22,25,39,40 can arise due to the error introduced by the low-resolution IPES measurements.…”
Section: A Band Alignment At Buffer/cztsse Interfacecontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The negative conduction offsets reveal a cliff-like band alignment at both heterointerfaces. According to device simulations, the cliff can act as a barrier against injected electrons at forward bias, resulting in recombination of majority carriers via defects at the interface 14 , 15 , 27 , 41 . Neverthenless, with decreasing the absolute value of the conduction band offset in the case of CdS/ACZTS, the barrier is lowered, and this can ultimately result in an increase in Voc and FF in ACZTS devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be different reasons why E A can be lower than the absorber's band gap when interface recombination is dominant [9]. Among them, a cliff-like conduction band offset (CBO) between CZTS and its typical heterojunction partner CdS (buffer layer) is often invoked because a large fraction of the existing CBO measurements [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and calculations [21,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] confirms it. Here, by "clifflike" or "negative" CBO we intend a lower-lying conduction band maximum of CdS with respect to CZTS(e) at the heterointerface, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%