“…Despite the large amount of recently published geochemical and geochronological data for rocks of the Acatlán Complex (e.g. Talavera-Mendoza et al, 2005;Keppie et al, 2006b;Murphy et al, 2006;Keppie and Dostal, 2007;Middleton et al, 2007;Miller et al, 2007;Grodzicki et al, 2008;Hinojosa-Prieto et al, 2008;Morales-Gámez and Keppie, 2008;RamosArias et al, 2008;Dostal and Keppie, 2009;Galaz Escanilla et al, 2009;Morales-Gámez et al, 2009aOrtega-Obregón et al, 2009;VegaGranillo et al, 2009aVegaGranillo et al, , 2009bOrtega-Obregón et al, 2010), the interpretation of its geological development throughout the Paleozoic remain controversial (Talavera-Mendoza et al, 2005;Nance et al, 2006b;Keppie et al, 2008b;Vega-Granillo et al, 2009a). Although these authors disagree on the paleogeographic location (and hence the relationship of these rocks to the amalgamation of Pangea), they generally agree that the Late Paleozoic history of the Acatlán Complex records subduction-related arc magmatism dominated by the Permian Totoltepec pluton and the broadly synchronous deposition of clastic rocks of the Tecomate Formation in the eastern Acatlán Complex.…”