2010
DOI: 10.1080/10236661003747031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and Thermal Analysis of Copper-Doped Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Films

Abstract: In the present study, the chemical structure of thermoresponsive copper-doped poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) thin films was investigated. The polymer thin films were deposited by spin-coating from a solution containing the polymer on silicon windows. Spin-coating was carried out at certain conditions yielding films of nanometric-scale thickness (170-250 mn). Thermal transitions such as low critical solution temperature (LCST) and glass transition temperature (T g ) of polymer samples with respect to copper concen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of S8P8 and S16P16 show glass transition temperatures ( T g ) of 81 and 89 °C, respectively, indicating an amorphous state without signs of crystallization (DSC methodology and curves in Figure S5). The T g values for these compounds are significantly lower than those of regular high-molecular-weight PNIPAM materials (within 110–140 °C). This depression is due to the low T g of the hyperbranched polyester core with T g values of similar branched polyester polyols reported to be within 25–40 °C. The hyperbranched polyesters with terminal alkyl fragments obtained in our previous study have a T g value of −30 °C and melting points of 40–60 °C, attributed to the crystalline phase formed by the alkyl component . The absence of melting peaks for S8P8 and S16P16 can be related to the suppression of crystallization of the alkyl branched components by adjacent PNIPAM macrocations …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of S8P8 and S16P16 show glass transition temperatures ( T g ) of 81 and 89 °C, respectively, indicating an amorphous state without signs of crystallization (DSC methodology and curves in Figure S5). The T g values for these compounds are significantly lower than those of regular high-molecular-weight PNIPAM materials (within 110–140 °C). This depression is due to the low T g of the hyperbranched polyester core with T g values of similar branched polyester polyols reported to be within 25–40 °C. The hyperbranched polyesters with terminal alkyl fragments obtained in our previous study have a T g value of −30 °C and melting points of 40–60 °C, attributed to the crystalline phase formed by the alkyl component . The absence of melting peaks for S8P8 and S16P16 can be related to the suppression of crystallization of the alkyl branched components by adjacent PNIPAM macrocations …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The characteristic π → π* transition of PNIPAM moiety appeared at around λ max of 263 nm for the NHC precursor (Figure 3, red curve). [ 52 ] On the other hand, for the NHC–Pd 2+ complex addition to the PNIPAM characteristics band (at around 263 nm), a broad hump appeared at 340 nm due to the presence of d–d transition (metal to ligand charge transfer—MLCT) of Pd (II) (Figure 3, pink curve). [ 53 ] In the case of NHC‐capped Pd NPs (catalysts 2 and 4), appearance of broad continuous bands at lower wavelength confirmed the presence of Pd (0) Nps (Figure 3, black curve).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, we fail to observe a predominant shift in the pyridine peaks as observed in the Pyridyl ‐ Triazole ‐ INT ‐ Cu ( I ) complex . Furthermore, it was seen that the NH, C=O (Amide I), and NH (Amide II) did not show any significant shift, such as shifting in the peak position or intensity variations of Amide I peak upon chelation with the metal, it proved that polymer chains were not involved in the binding with the copper (I) [52] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, it was seen that the NH, C=O (Amide I), and NH (Amide II) did not show any significant shift, such as shifting in the peak position or intensity variations of Amide I peak upon chelation with the metal, it proved that polymer chains were not involved in the binding with the copper (I). [52] Even though FTIR results failed to show significant results, the comparison of 1 H NMR results between thermoresponsive ligand (compound 2) and its copper (I) complex (compound 4) showed changes in the spectrum. Thus, even though the peaks concerning the polymer chain were not shown any shift in the chemical shift values; however, the peaks correspond to the pyridyl and triazole, which comes in the aromatic region, showed a slight shift towards higher chemical shift values, indicating the possibility of the binding of the ligand with the metal (Figure 5).…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Copper (I) Complexes (Comp...mentioning
confidence: 98%