2017
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and thermal controls of rockfall frequency and magnitude within rockwall–talus systems (Swiss Alps)

Abstract: Both from a systemic and natural hazard perspective, it is essential to understand the causes and frequency of rockfalls in mountain terrain and to predict the block sizes deposited at specific locations. Commonly, rockfalls are studied either retrospectively, using talus slopes, or directly by rockwall surveys. Nevertheless, our understanding of rockfall activity, particularly at the lower magnitude spectrum, is still incomplete. Moreover, the explanatory framework is rarely addressed explicitly. In this stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(194 reference statements)
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first monitoring period (2014–15), MARTs of north‐exposed rockwalls (Figure ) were between 2.8°C in the Brandji Valley (Br1 in Figure a) and 0.67°C in the Pipji Valley (Pr2 in Figure c). MARTs of the north‐exposed rockwalls in the Hungerli Valley were 1.39°C (Hr1) and 2.48°C (Hr2) as presented in Messenzehl and Dikau (Hr1 and Hr2 correspond to R1b and R2a). One year later (2015–16), MARTs dropped slightly to a minimum of 0.14°C (Pr2 in Figure c), indicating permafrost boundary conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the first monitoring period (2014–15), MARTs of north‐exposed rockwalls (Figure ) were between 2.8°C in the Brandji Valley (Br1 in Figure a) and 0.67°C in the Pipji Valley (Pr2 in Figure c). MARTs of the north‐exposed rockwalls in the Hungerli Valley were 1.39°C (Hr1) and 2.48°C (Hr2) as presented in Messenzehl and Dikau (Hr1 and Hr2 correspond to R1b and R2a). One year later (2015–16), MARTs dropped slightly to a minimum of 0.14°C (Pr2 in Figure c), indicating permafrost boundary conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…After this winter cooling, NSRTs rapidly increased followed by daily frost cycles in early spring (−5 to 7°C). In contrast, constant NSRTs have been recorded for several winter months (~116 d) at the Hungerli Peak, at Br3 (Figure a) and to some extent at Pr1 (Figure b). Stagnating winter temperatures between 0 and − 9°C recorded at those sites and the lack of temperature oscillations reveal an insulating rockwall snow cover on and close to the MTL drilling position that locally prevents progressive winter cooling and heat loss during spring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations