2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2020.107596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural annotation of the conserved carbohydrate esterase vb_24B_21 from Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophage Φ24B

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diversity in the catalytic domain was mainly restricted to a few amino acid positions, but higher variability was detected for the C-terminal domain. Remarkably, a study on the crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of vb_24B_21 NanS-p from phage Φ24B [61] revealed a lectin-like, jelly-roll β-sandwich fold that predictably acts as a non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding module that could assist esterase activity. Further studies are necessary to evaluate if the NanS-p subtypes differ in their activity or in binding specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversity in the catalytic domain was mainly restricted to a few amino acid positions, but higher variability was detected for the C-terminal domain. Remarkably, a study on the crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of vb_24B_21 NanS-p from phage Φ24B [61] revealed a lectin-like, jelly-roll β-sandwich fold that predictably acts as a non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding module that could assist esterase activity. Further studies are necessary to evaluate if the NanS-p subtypes differ in their activity or in binding specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 3X2L (Nakamura et al, 2015) • 3X32 (Hirano et al, 2015) • 4TKJ (Matsuoka et al, 2015) • 3X0J (Furuike et al, 2016) • 5WQR (Ohno et al, 2017) • 6EQE (Austin et al, 2018) • 6ETK (Vergara et al, 2018) • 6FJN (Baker et al, 2019) • 6JGJ (Takaba et al, 2019) • 6RYG (Paterson et al, 2019) • 6IIP (Tian et al, 2019) • 6Q01 (Schellenberg et al, 2020) • 6XVM (Plaza-Garrido et al, 2020) • 6Y5S (Wu et al, 2020) • 6YP6 (Franke et al, 2020) • 7A5M (Barone et al, 2020) • 7K4T (Otten et al, 2020) • 6YK4 (Frydenvang et al, 2020) • 6SAY (Glöckner et al, 2020)…”
Section: A Geometric Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%