Learning, Design, and Technology 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_23-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Assessment of Knowledge as, of, and for Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pre- and post-test MMA was assessed using a structural knowledge assessment method based on the relatedness ratings of relevant domain concepts (e.g., Kraiger et al, 1995; Wouters et al, 2011). In the field of education, structural knowledge assessment has previously been used to assess mental models in a variety of topics (for an overview, see Trumpower and Vanapalli, 2016). Additionally, structural assessment has been applied in the context of multimedia learning to investigate mental model development in domains such as medical skills training (van der Spek et al, 2010, 2011; Wouters et al, 2011) and financial education (Riemer and Schrader, 2016a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre- and post-test MMA was assessed using a structural knowledge assessment method based on the relatedness ratings of relevant domain concepts (e.g., Kraiger et al, 1995; Wouters et al, 2011). In the field of education, structural knowledge assessment has previously been used to assess mental models in a variety of topics (for an overview, see Trumpower and Vanapalli, 2016). Additionally, structural assessment has been applied in the context of multimedia learning to investigate mental model development in domains such as medical skills training (van der Spek et al, 2010, 2011; Wouters et al, 2011) and financial education (Riemer and Schrader, 2016a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This proves that the instrument has good specificity. The intended specificity is the instrument's ability to distinguish the specificity of each factor based on its correlation value (Trumpower et al, 2010). The results of Cronbach's alpha analysis in Table 3 reveal that the reliability value ranges from 0.74 to 0.85.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%