1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19980901)32:4<504::aid-prot8>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural basis for specificity of papain-like cysteine protease proregions toward their cognate enzymes

Abstract: Synthetic peptides corresponding to the proregions of papain-like cysteine proteases have been shown to be good and selective inhibitors of their parental enzymes. The molecular basis for their selectivity, quite remarkable in some cases, is not fully understood. The recent determination of the crystal structures of three distinct papain-like cysteine protease zymogens allows detailed structural comparisons to be made. The reasons for the specificity shown by each proregion toward its cognate enzyme are explai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prosegments appear to adopt stably folded structures when bound to the protease domain in their cognate proenzymes and have regions of multiple interfacial contacts with catalytic domains (12), which govern their affinities and specificities (27). Although the majority of isolated prosegments of proteases are either unstructured (23) or possess a loosely packed structure (28), the strongest inhibitory properties demonstrate those isolated prosegments, which reveal a folded tertiary structure (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosegments appear to adopt stably folded structures when bound to the protease domain in their cognate proenzymes and have regions of multiple interfacial contacts with catalytic domains (12), which govern their affinities and specificities (27). Although the majority of isolated prosegments of proteases are either unstructured (23) or possess a loosely packed structure (28), the strongest inhibitory properties demonstrate those isolated prosegments, which reveal a folded tertiary structure (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary role of this motif is thought to be stabilization of the structural arrangement of helixes ␣1-␣3 and strand ␤1 of the pro-peptide into a discrete globular domain. In procaricain/procathepsin L, the packing of helices ␣1 and ␣2 is determined by the interactions of the three aromatic residues F/W22p, W25p, and F/W46p (1PCI numbering), among which the last residue is part of the ERFNIN motif (44). The residues that occupy the corresponding positions in the rproDer p 1-CN structure are F8, Y11, and F32 (Fig.…”
Section: The Folding Of the Pro-peptidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neither E38p nor R42p, which are part of the ERFNIN motif, are structurally conserved in rproDer p 1-CN, and this part of the network is thus not present in the mite enzyme. The relative orientation of helix ␣2 and strand ␤1 is similar in procaricain and procathepsin L, and the two residues that stabilize this fold are I53p and N57p through side chain hydrophobic contacts and hydrogen bonds, respectively (44). Both residues are part of the ERFNIN motif and are again not conserved in rproDer p 1-CN because they are located C terminally in helix ␣2, which is truncated in rproDer p 1-CN.…”
Section: The Folding Of the Pro-peptidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mechanism prevents premature proteolysis and targets enzymic activities to the compartment where their function is required. In many cases, activation occurs by the removal of an inhibitory segment, usually located in the N-terminus of the peptidase [2,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%