2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.273573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Basis for the 14-3-3 Protein-dependent Inhibition of the Regulator of G Protein Signaling 3 (RGS3) Function

Abstract: Background: The 14-3-3 protein binds to and regulates the function of the regulator of G protein signaling 3 (RGS3). Results: The 14-3-3 binding affects the structure of the G␣ interaction portion of RGS3. Conclusion: The 14-3-3 protein blocks the interaction between the RGS3 and the G␣. Significance: This might explain the inhibitory function of 14-3-3 in the regulation of RGS3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be attributed to a bound fraction of DANS-TRE sensing lower solvation and decreased microenvironmental polarity in the binding pocket of the complex. The value is consistent with values commonly found for the dansyl moiety covalently linked to globular proteins (34,35). The fractional intensity of the 14.3-ns component in the Bmh1:pNth1 1-751 (E674A) complex (4.2%) is significantly higher than in the presence of pNth1 1-751 (E674A) (0.5%) or Bmh1 alone (1.3%), where the presence of the long component likely indicates some nonspecific interaction of DANS-TRE with Bmh1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This could be attributed to a bound fraction of DANS-TRE sensing lower solvation and decreased microenvironmental polarity in the binding pocket of the complex. The value is consistent with values commonly found for the dansyl moiety covalently linked to globular proteins (34,35). The fractional intensity of the 14.3-ns component in the Bmh1:pNth1 1-751 (E674A) complex (4.2%) is significantly higher than in the presence of pNth1 1-751 (E674A) (0.5%) or Bmh1 alone (1.3%), where the presence of the long component likely indicates some nonspecific interaction of DANS-TRE with Bmh1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…[37][38][39][40] 14-3-3 might interfere with the binding of RGS proteins to their G␣ targets, and recent data on RGS3 suggest that 14-3-3 binding induces a conformational change in RGS3 that is likely to affect the interaction of RGS3 and G␣. 42,43 Our studies on the interaction between RGS18 and Gi2 and Gq by co-immunoprecipitation from transfected cells showed a trend toward increased binding of the 14-3-3-deficient RGS18 mutant to Gi2 and Gq compared with wt-RGS18; however, this effect was not statistically significant (data not shown). Live microscopy of fluorescently labeled wt-RGS18 and 14-3-3-deficient mutants in transfected cells did not reveal any major difference in subcellular distribution (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Other peptides of the Hsp70⅐ATP protein were not differentially deuterated in the presence of Tomm34, including peptide 611-638 covering the C terminus. The absence of protection of the extreme Hsp70 C terminus might be caused by the high flexibility of this region (24,62) or by side chain-mediated interactions that cannot be trapped by H/D exchange. These data suggest that the identified Hsp70 segment spanning amino acids 519 -529/533-543 represent the additional Hsp70/Tomm34 interaction interface formed exclusively in the ATP-bound conformation of Hsp70, or this region reflects allosteric changes induced by Tomm34 binding to different Hsp70⅐ATP sites.…”
Section: Hsp70 Allostery and Chaperone/co-chaperone Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 97%